mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Magnetic Hysteresis Modeling with Neural Operators

arXiv 2407.03261 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.RO cs.SYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hysteresis modeling is crucial to comprehend the behavior of magnetic devices, facilitating optimal designs. Hitherto, deep learning-based methods employed to model hysteresis, face challenges in generalizing to novel input magnetic fields. This paper addresses the generalization challenge by proposing neural operators for modeling constitutive laws that exhibit magnetic hysteresis by learning a mapping between magnetic fields. In particular, three neural operators-deep operator network, Fourier neural operator, and wavelet neural operator-are employed to predict novel first-order reversal curves and minor loops, where novel means they are not used to train the model. In addition, a rate-independent Fourier neural operator is proposed to predict material responses at sampling rates different from those used during training to incorporate the rate-independent characteristics of magnetic hysteresis. The presented numerical experiments demonstrate that neural operators efficiently model magnetic hysteresis, outperforming the traditional neural recurrent methods on various metrics and generalizing to novel magnetic fields. The findings emphasize the advantages of using neural operators for modeling hysteresis under varying magnetic conditions, underscoring their importance in characterizing magnetic material based devices. The codes related to this paper are at github.com/chandratue/magnetic_hysteresis_neural_operator.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2024.

Builds on

15 of 55 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  3. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  5. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
  6. 2023Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Designcited by 218
  7. 2023Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEscited by 207
  8. 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating PDEscited by 115
  9. 2023In-Context Operator Learning with Data Prompts for Differential Equation Problemscited by 98
  10. 2022Learning Operators with Coupled Attentioncited by 88
  11. 2023Physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse problems in complex beam systemscited by 24
  12. 2024Peridynamic Neural Operators: A Data-Driven Nonlocal Constitutive Model for Complex Material Responsescited by 18
3 more
  1. 2023Neural oscillators for generalization of physics-informed machine learningcited by 9
  2. 2023Transfer learning for improved generalizability in causal physics-informed neural networks for beam simulationscited by 8
  3. 2023Neural oscillators for magnetic hysteresis modelingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.