mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Full Poisoning: Effective Availability Attacks with Partial Perturbation

arXiv 2407.02437 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.CR cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread use of publicly available datasets for training machine learning models raises significant concerns about data misuse. Availability attacks have emerged as a means for data owners to safeguard their data by designing imperceptible perturbations that degrade model performance when incorporated into training datasets. However, existing availability attacks are ineffective when only a portion of the data can be perturbed. To address this challenge, we propose a novel availability attack approach termed Parameter Matching Attack (PMA). PMA is the first availability attack capable of causing more than a 30% performance drop when only a portion of data can be perturbed. PMA optimizes perturbations so that when the model is trained on a mixture of clean and perturbed data, the resulting model will approach a model designed to perform poorly. Experimental results across four datasets demonstrate that PMA outperforms existing methods, achieving significant model performance degradation when a part of the training data is perturbed. Our code is available in the supplementary materials.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2024.

Builds on

25 of 32 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  5. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  6. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  7. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  8. 2022Dataset Distillation by Matching Training Trajectoriescited by 437
  9. 2021Unlearnable Examples: Making Personal Data Unexploitablecited by 188
  10. 2020Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matchingcited by 156
  11. 2021Adversarial Examples Make Strong Poisonscited by 115
  12. 2021Sleeper Agent: Scalable Hidden Trigger Backdoors for Neural Networks Trained from Scratchcited by 98
13 more
  1. 2019Learning to Confuse: Generating Training Time Adversarial Data with Auto-Encodercited by 70
  2. 2021Availability Attacks Create Shortcutscited by 60
  3. 2021Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial Trainingcited by 58
  4. 2022Autoregressive Perturbations for Data Poisoningcited by 45
  5. 2023Image Shortcut Squeezing: Countering Perturbative Availability Poisons with Compressioncited by 39
  6. 2021Preventing Unauthorized Use of Proprietary Data: Poisoning for Secure Dataset Releasecited by 35
  7. 2022Robust Unlearnable Examples: Protecting Data Against Adversarial Learningcited by 34
  8. 2023CUDA: Convolution-based Unlearnable Datasetscited by 26
  9. 2022Indiscriminate Data Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 24
  10. 2023Exploring the Limits of Model-Targeted Indiscriminate Data Poisoning Attackscited by 23
  11. 2023What Can We Learn from Unlearnable Datasets?cited by 21
  12. 2022Self-Ensemble Protection: Training Checkpoints Are Good Data Protectorscited by 19
  13. 2023BadLabel: A Robust Perspective on Evaluating and Enhancing Label-noise Learningcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.