Beyond Full Poisoning: Effective Availability Attacks with Partial Perturbation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The widespread use of publicly available datasets for training machine learning models raises significant concerns about data misuse. Availability attacks have emerged as a means for data owners to safeguard their data by designing imperceptible perturbations that degrade model performance when incorporated into training datasets. However, existing availability attacks are ineffective when only a portion of the data can be perturbed. To address this challenge, we propose a novel availability attack approach termed Parameter Matching Attack (PMA). PMA is the first availability attack capable of causing more than a 30% performance drop when only a portion of data can be perturbed. PMA optimizes perturbations so that when the model is trained on a mixture of clean and perturbed data, the resulting model will approach a model designed to perform poorly. Experimental results across four datasets demonstrate that PMA outperforms existing methods, achieving significant model performance degradation when a part of the training data is perturbed. Our code is available in the supplementary materials.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2024.
Builds on
25 of 32 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
- 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
- 2022Dataset Distillation by Matching Training Trajectoriescited by 437
- 2021Unlearnable Examples: Making Personal Data Unexploitablecited by 188
- 2020Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matchingcited by 156
- 2021Adversarial Examples Make Strong Poisonscited by 115
- 2021Sleeper Agent: Scalable Hidden Trigger Backdoors for Neural Networks Trained from Scratchcited by 98
13 more
- 2019Learning to Confuse: Generating Training Time Adversarial Data with Auto-Encodercited by 70
- 2021Availability Attacks Create Shortcutscited by 60
- 2021Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial Trainingcited by 58
- 2022Autoregressive Perturbations for Data Poisoningcited by 45
- 2023Image Shortcut Squeezing: Countering Perturbative Availability Poisons with Compressioncited by 39
- 2021Preventing Unauthorized Use of Proprietary Data: Poisoning for Secure Dataset Releasecited by 35
- 2022Robust Unlearnable Examples: Protecting Data Against Adversarial Learningcited by 34
- 2023CUDA: Convolution-based Unlearnable Datasetscited by 26
- 2022Indiscriminate Data Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2023Exploring the Limits of Model-Targeted Indiscriminate Data Poisoning Attackscited by 23
- 2023What Can We Learn from Unlearnable Datasets?cited by 21
- 2022Self-Ensemble Protection: Training Checkpoints Are Good Data Protectorscited by 19
- 2023BadLabel: A Robust Perspective on Evaluating and Enhancing Label-noise Learningcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Adversarial Training: A Surveycited by 6
- 2024Adversarial Training: A Survey19 Oct 2024