Beyond Numeric Rewards: In-Context Dueling Bandits with LLM Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Reinforcement learning for LLM agents
Abstract (arXiv)
In-Context Reinforcement Learning (ICRL) is a frontier paradigm to solve Reinforcement Learning (RL) problems in the foundation model era. While ICRL capabilities have been demonstrated in transformers through task-specific training, the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) out-of-the-box remains largely unexplored. This paper investigates whether LLMs can generalize cross-domain to perform ICRL under the problem of Dueling Bandits (DB), a stateless preference-based RL setting. We find that the top-performing LLMs exhibit a notable zero-shot capacity for relative decision-making, which translates to low short-term weak regret across all DB environment instances by quickly including the best arm in duels. However, an optimality gap still exists between LLMs and classic DB algorithms in terms of strong regret. LLMs struggle to converge and consistently exploit even when explicitly prompted to do so, and are sensitive to prompt variations. To bridge this gap, we propose an agentic flow framework: LLM with Enhanced Algorithmic Dueling (LEAD), which integrates off-the-shelf DB algorithm support with LLM agents through fine-grained adaptive interplay. We show that LEAD has theoretical guarantees inherited from classic DB algorithms on both weak and strong regret. We validate its efficacy and robustness even with noisy and adversarial prompts. The design of such an agentic framework sheds light on how to enhance the trustworthiness of general-purpose LLMs generalized to in-context decision-making tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2024.
Builds on
7 of 18 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 6
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Modelcited by 861
- 2024Large Language Models to Enhance Bayesian Optimizationcited by 135
- 2015Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 101
- 2014Reducing Dueling Bandits to Cardinal Banditscited by 62
- 2016Double Thompson Sampling for Dueling Banditscited by 42
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024LLMs Are In-Context Bandit Reinforcement Learners
- 2024EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For In-Context Exploration
- 2025When Greedy Wins: Emergent Exploitation Bias in Meta-Bandit LLM Training
- 2025LLMs are Greedy Agents: Effects of RL Fine-tuning on Decision-Making Abilities
- 2024On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision Making
- 2024Survey on Large Language Model-Enhanced Reinforcement Learning: Concept, Taxonomy, and Methods
- 2024From Words to Actions: Unveiling the Theoretical Underpinnings of LLM-Driven Autonomous Systems
- 2025Meta-Prompt Optimization for LLM-Based Sequential Decision Making