Binary Losses for Density Ratio Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimating the ratio of two probability densities from a finite number of observations is a central machine learning problem. A common approach is to construct estimators using binary classifiers that distinguish observations from the two densities. However, the accuracy of these estimators depends on the choice of the binary loss function, raising the question of which loss function to choose based on desired error properties. For example, traditional loss functions, such as logistic or boosting loss, prioritize accurate estimation of small density ratio values over large ones, even though the latter are more critical in many applications. In this work, we start with prescribed error measures in a class of Bregman divergences and characterize all loss functions that result in density ratio estimators with small error. Our characterization extends results on composite binary losses from (Reid & Williamson, 2010) and their connection to density ratio estimation as identified by (Menon & Ong, 2016). As a result, we obtain a simple recipe for constructing loss functions with certain properties, such as those that prioritize an accurate estimation of large density ratio values. Our novel loss functions outperform related approaches for resolving parameter choice issues of 11 deep domain adaptation algorithms in average performance across 484 real-world tasks including sensor signals, texts, and images.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2024.
Builds on
29 of 76 references.
References · 29
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
- 2014Deep Domain Confusion: Maximizing for Domain Invariancecited by 597
- 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
- 2018A DIRT-T Approach to Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 215
- 2017Central Moment Discrepancy (CMD) for Domain-Invariant Representation Learningcited by 192
- 2016Correlation Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 146
- 2016Learning in Implicit Generative Modelscited by 124
- 2021Deep Subdomain Adaptation Network for Image Classificationcited by 119
- 2020Telescoping Density-Ratio Estimationcited by 108
- 2022Refining Generative Process with Discriminator Guidance in Score-based Diffusion Modelscited by 98
- 2019HoMM: Higher-order Moment Matching for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 89
17 more
- 2020Multi-Source Deep Domain Adaptation with Weak Supervision for Time-Series Sensor Datacited by 82
- 2019Bias Correction of Learned Generative Models using Likelihood-Free Importance Weightingcited by 70
- 2022ADATIME: A Benchmarking Suite for Domain Adaptation on Time Series Datacited by 45
- 2020Non-Negative Bregman Divergence Minimization for Deep Direct Density Ratio Estimationcited by 43
- 2019On Minimum Discrepancy Estimation for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 34
- 2021Featurized Density Ratio Estimationcited by 33
- 2017Robust Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Neural Networks via Moment Alignmentcited by 29
- 2018Conditional Noise-Contrastive Estimation of Unnormalised Modelscited by 25
- 2024Training Unbiased Diffusion Models From Biased Datasetcited by 25
- 2022Spectral Regularized Kernel Two-Sample Testscited by 19
- 2017Boosted Generative Modelscited by 18
- 2023Estimating the Density Ratio between Distributions with High Discrepancy using Multinomial Logistic Regressioncited by 17
- 2023Addressing Parameter Choice Issues in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Aggregationcited by 15
- 2019Kernel Conditional Density Operatorscited by 14
- 2023On regularized Radon-Nikodym differentiationcited by 10
- 2023Adaptive learning of density ratios in RKHScited by 8
- 2024Overcoming Saturation in Density Ratio Estimation by Iterated Regularizationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025Diffusion Secant Alignment for Score-Based Density Ratio Estimationcited by 3
- 2026One-Step Score-Based Density Ratio Estimationcited by 1
- 2026One-Step Score-Based Density Ratio Estimation12 Apr 2026
- 2025Diffusion Secant Alignment for Score-Based Density Ratio Estimation5 Sep 2025