Can Small Language Models Learn, Unlearn, and Retain Noise Patterns?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the growing need for efficient language models in resource-constrained environments, Small Language Models (SLMs) have emerged as compact and practical alternatives to Large Language Models (LLMs). While studies have explored noise handling in LLMs, little is known about how SLMs handle noise, a critical factor for their reliable real-world deployment. This study investigates the ability of SLMs with parameters between 1 and 3 billion to learn, retain, and subsequently eliminate different types of noise (word flip, character flip, transliteration, irrelevant content, and contradictory information). Four pretrained SLMs (Olmo 1B, Qwen1.5 1.8B, Gemma1.1 2B, and Phi2 2.7B) were instruction-tuned on noise-free data and tested with in-context examples to assess noise learning. Subsequently, noise patterns were introduced in instruction tuning to assess their adaptability. The results revealed differences in how models handle noise, with smaller models like Olmo quickly adapting to noise patterns. Phi2's carefully curated, structured, and high-quality pretraining data enabled resistance to character level, transliteration, and counterfactual noise, while Gemma adapted successfully to transliteration noise through its multilingual pretraining. Subsequent clean data training effectively mitigated noise effects. These findings provide practical strategies for developing robust SLMs for real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2024.
Builds on
26 of 39 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
- 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
- 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 694
- 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
14 more
- 2024TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Modelcited by 604
- 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 599
- 2023Textbooks Are All You Needcited by 561
- 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 559
- 2020MobileBERT: a Compact Task-Agnostic BERT for Resource-Limited Devicescited by 476
- 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 399
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 230
- 2024MobileLLM: Optimizing Sub-billion Parameter Language Models for On-Device Use Casescited by 216
- 2022NoisyTune: A Little Noise Can Help You Finetune Pretrained Language Models Bettercited by 43
- 2024RomanSetu: Efficiently unlocking multilingual capabilities of Large Language Models via Romanizationcited by 29
- 2023Noise-Robust Fine-Tuning of Pretrained Language Models via External Guidancecited by 24
- 2024Resilience of Large Language Models for Noisy Instructionscited by 20
- 2024Understanding the Effect of Noise in LLM Training Data with Algorithmic Chains of Thoughtcited by 19
- 2021Analysing the Noise Model Error for Realistic Noisy Label Datacited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.