mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

View From Above: A Framework for Evaluating Distribution Shifts in Model Behavior

arXiv 2407.00948 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When large language models (LLMs) are asked to perform certain tasks, how can we be sure that their learned representations align with reality? We propose a domain-agnostic framework for systematically evaluating distribution shifts in LLMs decision-making processes, where they are given control of mechanisms governed by pre-defined rules. While individual LLM actions may appear consistent with expected behavior, across a large number of trials, statistically significant distribution shifts can emerge. To test this, we construct a well-defined environment with known outcome logic: blackjack. In more than 1,000 trials, we uncover statistically significant evidence suggesting behavioral misalignment in the learned representations of LLM.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2024.

Builds on

9 of 18 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
  2. 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,251
  3. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
  4. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
  5. 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 377
  6. 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 180
  7. 2023Generative agent-based modeling with actions grounded in physical, social, or digital space using Concordiacited by 126
  8. 2023Instructed to Bias: Instruction-Tuned Language Models Exhibit Emergent Cognitive Biascited by 53
  9. 2023Towards A Unified Agent with Foundation Modelscited by 47

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.