mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Look Ahead or Look Around? A Theoretical Comparison Between Autoregressive and Masked Pretraining

arXiv 2407.00935 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, the rise of generative self-supervised learning (SSL) paradigms has exhibited impressive performance across visual, language, and multi-modal domains. While the varied designs of generative SSL objectives lead to distinct properties in downstream tasks, a theoretical understanding of these differences remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we establish the first theoretical comparisons between two leading generative SSL paradigms: autoregressive SSL and masked SSL. Through establishing theoretical frameworks, we elucidate the strengths and limitations of autoregressive and masked SSL within the primary evaluation tasks of classification and content generation. Our findings demonstrate that in classification tasks, the flexibility of targeted tokens in masked SSL fosters more inter-sample connections compared to the fixed position of target tokens in autoregressive SSL, which yields superior clustering performance. In content generation tasks, the misalignment between the flexible lengths of test samples and the fixed length of unmasked texts in masked SSL (vs. flexible lengths of conditional texts in autoregressive SSL) hinders its generation performance. To leverage each other's strengths and mitigate weaknesses, we propose diversity-enhanced autoregressive and variable-length masked objectives, which substantially improve the classification performance of autoregressive SSL and the generation performance of masked SSL. Code is available at https://github.com/PKU-ML/LookAheadLookAround.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2024.

Builds on

37 of 47 references.

References · 37

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  6. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  7. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  8. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  9. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  10. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  11. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  12. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
25 more
  1. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
  2. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  3. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,591
  4. 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,153
  5. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
  6. 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 670
  7. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
  8. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
  9. 2022MultiMAE: Multi-modal Multi-task Masked Autoencoderscited by 291
  10. 2016Learning Representations for Automatic Colorizationcited by 251
  11. 2020DeCLUTR: Deep Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Textual Representationscited by 251
  12. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 235
  13. 2020How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?cited by 213
  14. 2022What Language Model Architecture and Pretraining Objective Work Best for Zero-Shot Generalization?cited by 150
  15. 2022Chaos is a Ladder: A New Theoretical Understanding of Contrastive Learning via Augmentation Overlapcited by 105
  16. 2022Cramming: Training a Language Model on a Single GPU in One Daycited by 81
  17. 2018Semi-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 48
  18. 2023Understanding Masked Autoencoders via Hierarchical Latent Variable Modelscited by 39
  19. 2019Language Models with Transformerscited by 36
  20. 2022Architecture-Agnostic Masked Image Modeling -- From ViT back to CNNcited by 31
  21. 2023On the Generalization of Multi-modal Contrastive Learningcited by 30
  22. 2022Self-supervision through Random Segments with Autoregressive Coding (RandSAC)cited by 16
  23. 2023Identifiable Contrastive Learning with Automatic Feature Importance Discoverycited by 14
  24. 2023ArCL: Enhancing Contrastive Learning with Augmentation-Robust Representationscited by 10
  25. 2023Evaluating Self-Supervised Learning via Risk Decompositioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

7 papers.