Scalable and Domain-General Abstractive Proposition Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Segmenting text into fine-grained units of meaning is important to a wide range of NLP applications. The default approach of segmenting text into sentences is often insufficient, especially since sentences are usually complex enough to include multiple units of meaning that merit separate treatment in the downstream task. We focus on the task of abstractive proposition segmentation (APS): transforming text into simple, self-contained, well-formed sentences. Several recent works have demonstrated the utility of proposition segmentation with few-shot prompted LLMs for downstream tasks such as retrieval-augmented grounding and fact verification. However, this approach does not scale to large amounts of text and may not always extract all the facts from the input text. In this paper, we first introduce evaluation metrics for the task to measure several dimensions of quality. We then propose a scalable, yet accurate, proposition segmentation model. We model proposition segmentation as a supervised task by training LLMs on existing annotated datasets and show that training yields significantly improved results. We further show that by using the fine-tuned LLMs (Gemini Pro and Gemini Ultra) as teachers for annotating large amounts of multi-domain synthetic distillation data, we can train smaller student models (Gemma 1 2B and 7B) with results similar to the teacher LLMs. We then demonstrate that our technique leads to effective domain generalization, by annotating data in two domains outside the original training data and evaluating on them. Finally, as a key contribution of the paper, we share an easy-to-use API for NLP practitioners to use.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2024.
Builds on
23 of 46 references.
References · 23
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 889
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
- 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 584
- 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
- 2022RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Modelscited by 286
- 2024Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Surveycited by 157
- 2022Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluationcited by 141
- 2023WiCE: Real-World Entailment for Claims in Wikipediacited by 118
- 2023Complex Claim Verification with Evidence Retrieved in the Wildcited by 110
11 more
- 2021Decontextualization: Making Sentences Stand-Alonecited by 101
- 2022Generating Literal and Implied Subquestions to Fact-check Complex Claimscited by 66
- 2024VariErr NLI: Separating Annotation Error from Human Label Variationcited by 42
- 2024A Closer Look at Claim Decompositioncited by 40
- 2022PropSegmEnt: A Large-Scale Corpus for Proposition-Level Segmentation and Entailment Recognitioncited by 29
- 2024FENICE: Factuality Evaluation of summarization based on Natural language Inference and Claim Extractioncited by 28
- 2024Learning to Plan and Generate Text with Citationscited by 28
- 2022SMART: Sentences as Basic Units for Text Evaluationcited by 17
- 2024A synthetic data approach for domain generalization of NLI modelscited by 15
- 2024Presentations are not always linear! GNN meets LLM for Document-to-Presentation Transformation with Attributioncited by 10
- 2024Document-level Claim Extraction and Decontextualisation for Fact-Checkingcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025Entailed Between the Lines: Incorporating Implication into NLIcited by 9
- 2025ATOM: AdapTive and OptiMized dynamic temporal knowledge graph construction using LLMscited by 7
- 2025A Survey of LLM × DATAcited by 4
- 2026ReqGenX: An Empirical Study of Atomic Decomposition, Artifact Regeneration, and Reconstruction for Legacy SRS Documentscited by 0
- 2026Configurable Semantic Chunking for Biomedical Information Extraction in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 0
- 2026Peerify: Benchmarking Peer-Review Claim Verificationcited by 0
- 2026Peerify: Benchmarking Peer-Review Claim Verification2 Sep 2026
- 2026Configurable Semantic Chunking for Biomedical Information Extraction in Retrieval-Augmented Generation31 Aug 2026
- 2026ReqGenX: An Empirical Study of Atomic Decomposition, Artifact Regeneration, and Reconstruction for Legacy SRS Documents18 Jul 2026
- 2025ATOM: AdapTive and OptiMized dynamic temporal knowledge graph construction using LLMs26 Oct 2025
- 2025A Survey of LLM × DATA24 May 2025
- 2025Entailed Between the Lines: Incorporating Implication into NLI13 Jan 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SPARTA: Evaluating Reasoning Segmentation Robustness through Black-Box Adversarial Paraphrasing in Text Autoencoder Latent Space
- 2026Efficient Reasoning via Thought Compression for Language Segmentation
- 2022Few-shot Mining of Naturally Occurring Inputs and Outputs
- 2026Semantic Abstraction for Natural Language Inference: a Methodological Framework for Discovering and Compensating Semantic Knowledge and Reasoning Gaps in Large Language Models
- 2026DR2Seg: Decomposed Two-Stage Rollouts for Efficient Reasoning Segmentation in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2023Large Language Models are Not Yet Human-Level Evaluators for Abstractive Summarization
- 2025DeepSeek-R1 vs. o3-mini: How Well can Reasoning LLMs Evaluate MT and Summarization?
- 2025SR-LLM: Rethinking the Structured Representation in Large Language Model