Grassmannian optimization is NP-hard
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We show that unconstrained quadratic optimization over a Grassmannian operatornameGr(k,n) is NP-hard. Our results cover all scenarios: (i) when k and n are both allowed to grow; (ii) when k is arbitrary but fixed; (iii) when k is fixed at its lowest possible value 1. We then deduce the NP-hardness of unconstrained cubic optimization over the Stiefel manifold operatornameV(k,n) and the orthogonal group operatornameO(n). As an addendum we demonstrate the NP-hardness of unconstrained quadratic optimization over the Cartan manifold, i.e., the positive definite cone mathbbSnscriptscriptstyle++ regarded as a Riemannian manifold, another popular example in manifold optimization. We will also establish the nonexistence of FPTAS in all cases.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Deflation-Free Optimal Scoringcited by 0
- 2026Deflation-Free Optimal Scoring28 Apr 2026