Fine-tuned network relies on generic representation to solve unseen cognitive task
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuning pretrained language models has shown promising results on a wide range of tasks, but when encountering a novel task, do they rely more on generic pretrained representation, or develop brand new task-specific solutions? Here, we fine-tuned GPT-2 on a context-dependent decision-making task, novel to the model but adapted from neuroscience literature. We compared its performance and internal mechanisms to a version of GPT-2 trained from scratch on the same task. Our results show that fine-tuned models depend heavily on pretrained representations, particularly in later layers, while models trained from scratch develop different, more task-specific mechanisms. These findings highlight the advantages and limitations of pretraining for task generalization and underscore the need for further investigation into the mechanisms underpinning task-specific fine-tuning in LLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2024.
Builds on
8 of 17 references.
References · 8
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 388
- 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 77
- 2021Relating transformers to models and neural representations of the hippocampal formationcited by 62
- 2023Gated recurrent neural networks discover attentioncited by 7
- 2024Transformers and Cortical Waves: Encoders for Pulling In Context Across Timecited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.