mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fine-tuned network relies on generic representation to solve unseen cognitive task

arXiv 2406.18926 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning pretrained language models has shown promising results on a wide range of tasks, but when encountering a novel task, do they rely more on generic pretrained representation, or develop brand new task-specific solutions? Here, we fine-tuned GPT-2 on a context-dependent decision-making task, novel to the model but adapted from neuroscience literature. We compared its performance and internal mechanisms to a version of GPT-2 trained from scratch on the same task. Our results show that fine-tuned models depend heavily on pretrained representations, particularly in later layers, while models trained from scratch develop different, more task-specific mechanisms. These findings highlight the advantages and limitations of pretraining for task generalization and underscore the need for further investigation into the mechanisms underpinning task-specific fine-tuning in LLMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2024.

Builds on

8 of 17 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 388
  5. 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 77
  6. 2021Relating transformers to models and neural representations of the hippocampal formationcited by 62
  7. 2023Gated recurrent neural networks discover attentioncited by 7
  8. 2024Transformers and Cortical Waves: Encoders for Pulling In Context Across Timecited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.