All Random Features Representations are Equivalent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Random features are a powerful technique for rewriting positive-definite kernels as linear products. They bring linear tools to bear in important nonlinear domains like KNNs and attention. Unfortunately, practical implementations require approximating an expectation, usually via sampling. This has led to the development of increasingly elaborate representations with ever lower sample error. We resolve this arms race by deriving an optimal sampling policy. Under this policy all random features representations have the same approximation error, which we show is the lowest possible. This means that we are free to choose whatever representation we please, provided we sample optimally.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2024.
Builds on
6 of 11 references.
References · 6
- 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,584
- 2015On the Equivalence between Kernel Quadrature Rules and Random Feature Expansionscited by 136
- 2022Chefs' Random Tables: Non-Trigonometric Random Featurescited by 20
- 2023Simplex Random Featurescited by 9
- 2017On Data-Dependent Random Features for Improved Generalization in Supervised Learningcited by 4
- 2023FAVOR#: Sharp Attention Kernel Approximations via New Classes of Positive Random Featurescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025The kernel of graph indices for vector searchcited by 0
- 2026Data-Aware Random Feature Kernel for Transformerscited by 0
- 2026Data-Aware Random Feature Kernel for Transformers4 Mar 2026
- 2025The kernel of graph indices for vector search25 Jun 2025