mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient and Accurate Explanation Estimation with Distribution Compression

arXiv 2406.18334 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We discover a theoretical connection between explanation estimation and distribution compression that significantly improves the approximation of feature attributions, importance, and effects. While the exact computation of various machine learning explanations requires numerous model inferences and becomes impractical, the computational cost of approximation increases with an ever-increasing size of data and model parameters. We show that the standard i.i.d. sampling used in a broad spectrum of algorithms for post-hoc explanation leads to an approximation error worthy of improvement. To this end, we introduce Compress Then Explain (CTE), a new paradigm of sample-efficient explainability. It relies on distribution compression through kernel thinning to obtain a data sample that best approximates its marginal distribution. CTE significantly improves the accuracy and stability of explanation estimation with negligible computational overhead. It often achieves an on-par explanation approximation error 2-3x faster by using fewer samples, i.e. requiring 2-3x fewer model evaluations. CTE is a simple, yet powerful, plug-in for any explanation method that now relies on i.i.d. sampling.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2024.

Builds on

46 of 71 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  4. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  5. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  6. 2020Dataset Condensation with Gradient Matchingcited by 510
  7. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  8. 2016Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyondcited by 360
  9. 2018Learning to Explain: An Information-Theoretic Perspective on Model Interpretationcited by 248
  10. 2019Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypescited by 223
  11. 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
  12. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 212
34 more
  1. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  2. 2022Dataset Condensation via Efficient Synthetic-Data Parameterizationcited by 187
  3. 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 169
  4. 2020Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation via Linear Regressioncited by 153
  5. 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
  6. 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 125
  7. 2021FastSHAP: Real-Time Shapley Value Estimationcited by 123
  8. 2022Algorithms to estimate Shapley value feature attributionscited by 114
  9. 2021The Out-of-Distribution Problem in Explainability and Search Methods for Feature Importance Explanationscited by 86
  10. 2022Towards Human-centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanationscited by 84
  11. 2022A Rigorous Study of Integrated Gradients Method and Extensions to Internal Neuron Attributionscited by 64
  12. 2023SHAP-IQ: Unified Approximation of any-order Shapley Interactionscited by 50
  13. 2021Kernel Thinningcited by 47
  14. 2021Explaining Hyperparameter Optimization via Partial Dependence Plotscited by 35
  15. 2023Approximating the Shapley Value without Marginal Contributionscited by 34
  16. 2023Extracting Class Activation Maps from Non-Discriminative Features as wellcited by 30
  17. 2024Beyond TreeSHAP: Efficient Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Tree Ensemblescited by 30
  18. 2021Generalized Kernel Thinningcited by 29
  19. 2023The Rashomon Importance Distribution: Getting RID of Unstable, Single Model-based Variable Importancecited by 29
  20. 2021On Locality of Local Explanation Modelscited by 25
  21. 2019Finite sample properties of parametric MMD estimation: robustness to misspecification and dependencecited by 24
  22. 2022SurvSHAP(t): Time-dependent explanations of machine learning survival modelscited by 24
  23. 2021Distribution Compression in Near-linear Timecited by 19
  24. 2021Using Shapley Values and Variational Autoencoders to Explain Predictive Models with Dependent Mixed Featurescited by 19
  25. 2023On the Robustness of Removal-Based Feature Attributionscited by 18
  26. 2023A Comparative Study of Methods for Estimating Conditional Shapley Values and When to Use Themcited by 15
  27. 2023Compress Then Test: Powerful Kernel Testing in Near-linear Timecited by 14
  28. 2020A Learning Theoretic Perspective on Local Explainabilitycited by 11
  29. 2019Sampling, Intervention, Prediction, Aggregation: A Generalized Framework for Model-Agnostic Interpretationscited by 9
  30. 2015Statistically efficient thinning of a Markov chain samplercited by 8
  31. 2023Coordinating Distributed Example Orders for Provably Accelerated Trainingcited by 7
  32. 2024Path Choice Matters for Clear Attribution in Path Methodscited by 4
  33. 2024On the Robustness of Global Feature Effect Explanationscited by 2
  34. 2024Resource-Aware Collaborative Monte Carlo Localization with Distribution Compressioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.