mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluation of Instruction-Following Ability for Large Language Models on Story-Ending Generation

arXiv 2406.16356 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across various benchmark tasks. While providing instructions to LLMs for guiding their generations is user-friendly, assessing their instruction-following capabilities is still unclarified due to a lack of evaluation metrics. In this paper, we focus on evaluating the instruction-following ability of LLMs in the context of story-ending generation, which requires diverse and context-specific instructions. We propose an automatic evaluation pipeline that utilizes a machine reading comprehension (MRC) model to determine whether the generated story-ending reflects instruction. Our findings demonstrate that our proposed metric aligns with human evaluation. Furthermore, our experiments confirm that recent open-source LLMs can achieve instruction-following performance close to GPT-3.5, as assessed through automatic evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2024.

Builds on

18 of 29 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  6. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  7. 2016A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Storiescited by 413
  8. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 290
  9. 2022CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilitiescited by 245
  10. 2023The Programmer's Assistant: Conversational Interaction with a Large Language Model for Software Developmentcited by 95
  11. 2024FOFO: A Benchmark to Evaluate LLMs' Format-Following Capabilitycited by 79
  12. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Taskscited by 73
6 more
  1. 2022Creative Writing with an AI-Powered Writing Assistant: Perspectives from Professional Writerscited by 69
  2. 2023Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarizationcited by 69
  3. 2023Towards Better Evaluation of Instruction-Following: A Case-Study in Summarizationcited by 18
  4. 2022Persona-Guided Planning for Controlling the Protagonist's Persona in Story Generationcited by 15
  5. 2022Possible Stories: Evaluating Situated Commonsense Reasoning under Multiple Possible Scenarioscited by 3
  6. 2022COMPASS: a Creative Support System that Alerts Novelists to the Unnoticed Missing Contentscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.