mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparison of Open-Source and Proprietary LLMs for Machine Reading Comprehension: A Practical Analysis for Industrial Applications

arXiv 2406.13713 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable performance in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications, such as sentiment analysis, content generation, and personalized recommendations. Despite their impressive capabilities, there remains a significant need for systematic studies concerning the practical application of LLMs in industrial settings, as well as the specific requirements and challenges related to their deployment in these contexts. This need is particularly critical for Machine Reading Comprehension (MCR), where factual, concise, and accurate responses are required. To date, most MCR rely on Small Language Models (SLMs) or Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). This trend is evident in the SQuAD2.0 rankings on the Papers with Code table. This article presents a comparative analysis between open-source LLMs and proprietary models on this task, aiming to identify light and open-source alternatives that offer comparable performance to proprietary models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.