Update Selective Parameters: Federated Machine Unlearning Based on Model Explanation
On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning is a promising privacy-preserving paradigm for distributed machine learning. In this context, there is sometimes a need for a specialized process called machine unlearning, which is required when the effect of some specific training samples needs to be removed from a learning model due to privacy, security, usability, and/or legislative factors. However, problems arise when current centralized unlearning methods are applied to existing federated learning, in which the server aims to remove all information about a class from the global model. Centralized unlearning usually focuses on simple models or is premised on the ability to access all training data at a central node. However, training data cannot be accessed on the server under the federated learning paradigm, conflicting with the requirements of the centralized unlearning process. Additionally, there are high computation and communication costs associated with accessing clients' data, especially in scenarios involving numerous clients or complex global models. To address these concerns, we propose a more effective and efficient federated unlearning scheme based on the concept of model explanation. Model explanation involves understanding deep networks and individual channel importance, so that this understanding can be used to determine which model channels are critical for classes that need to be unlearned. We select the most influential channels within an already-trained model for the data that need to be unlearned and fine-tune only influential channels to remove the contribution made by those data. In this way, we can simultaneously avoid huge consumption costs and ensure that the unlearned model maintains good performance. Experiments with different training models on various datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 22 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.
Builds on
22 of 41 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2022The Right to be Forgotten in Federated Learning: An Efficient Realization with Rapid Retraining14 Mar
- 2021Federated Unlearning via Class-Discriminative Pruning22 Oct
Other references · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
- 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 618
- 2014New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient methodcited by 443
- 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 319
- 2021Fast Yet Effective Machine Unlearningcited by 217
- 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
- 2021Graph Unlearningcited by 138
- 2020Machine Unlearning for Random Forestscited by 131
8 more
- 2018On the importance of single directions for generalizationcited by 99
- 2020Machine Unlearning: Linear Filtration for Logit-based Classifierscited by 95
- 2022Recommendation Unlearningcited by 80
- 2020DMCP: Differentiable Markov Channel Pruning for Neural Networkscited by 69
- 2019Ablation Studies in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 60
- 2018Exploiting Kernel Sparsity and Entropy for Interpretable CNN Compressioncited by 40
- 2018Revisiting the Importance of Individual Units in CNNs via Ablationcited by 32
- 2020More Than Privacy: Applying Differential Privacy in Key Areas of Artificial Intelligencecited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Evaluating of Machine Unlearning: Robustness Verification Without Prior Modificationscited by 3
- 2024Game-Theoretic Machine Unlearning: Mitigating Extra Privacy Leakagecited by 0
- 2025From Privacy to Trust in the Agentic Era: A Taxonomy of Challenges in Trustworthy Federated Learning Through the Lens of Trust Report 2.0cited by 0
- 2026Forgetting Similar Samples: Can Machine Unlearning Do it Better?cited by 0
- 2026Computation and Communication Efficient Federated Unlearning via On-server Gradient Conflict Mitigation and Expressioncited by 0
- 2026Computation and Communication Efficient Federated Unlearning via On-server Gradient Conflict Mitigation and Expression14 Mar 2026
- 2026Forgetting Similar Samples: Can Machine Unlearning Do it Better?11 Jan 2026
- 2025From Privacy to Trust in the Agentic Era: A Taxonomy of Challenges in Trustworthy Federated Learning Through the Lens of Trust Report 2.021 Jul 2025
- 2024Game-Theoretic Machine Unlearning: Mitigating Extra Privacy Leakage6 Nov 2024
- 2024Evaluating of Machine Unlearning: Robustness Verification Without Prior Modifications14 Oct 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Federated Unlearning: A Survey on Methods, Design Guidelines, and Evaluation Metrics
- 2022Federated Unlearning: How to Efficiently Erase a Client in FL?
- 2024Streamlined Federated Unlearning: Unite as One to Be Highly Efficient
- 2023Exploring Federated Unlearning: Review, Comparison, and Insights
- 2024A Survey on Federated Unlearning: Challenges and Opportunities
- 2023Forgettable Federated Linear Learning with Certified Data Unlearning
- 2024Towards Federated Domain Unlearning: Verification Methodologies and Challenges
- 2025Federated Unlearning Made Practical: Seamless Integration via Negated Pseudo-Gradients