mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Investigating Distributions of Telecom Adapted Sentence Embeddings for Document Retrieval

arXiv 2406.12336 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A plethora of sentence embedding models makes it challenging to choose one, especially for technical domains rich with specialized vocabulary. In this work, we domain adapt embeddings using telecom data for question answering. We evaluate embeddings obtained from publicly available models and their domain-adapted variants, on both point retrieval accuracies, as well as their (95%) confidence intervals. We establish a systematic method to obtain thresholds for similarity scores for different embeddings. As expected, we observe that fine-tuning improves mean bootstrapped accuracies. We also observe that it results in tighter confidence intervals, which further improve when pre-training is preceded by fine-tuning. We introduce metrics which measure the distributional overlaps of top-K, correct and random document similarities with the question. Further, we show that these metrics are correlated with retrieval accuracy and similarity thresholds. Recent literature shows conflicting effects of isotropy on retrieval accuracies. Our experiments establish that the isotropy of embeddings (as measured by two independent state-of-the-art isotropy metric definitions) is poorly correlated with retrieval performance. We show that embeddings for domain-specific sentences have little overlap with those for domain-agnostic ones, and fine-tuning moves them further apart. Based on our results, we provide recommendations for use of our methodology and metrics by researchers and practitioners.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.

Builds on

17 of 28 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  2. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
  3. 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
  4. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
  5. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
  6. 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 212
  7. 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 156
  8. 2023A Multi-Task Embedder For Retrieval Augmented LLMscited by 64
  9. 2021IsoScore: Measuring the Uniformity of Embedding Space Utilizationcited by 53
  10. 2022Problems with Cosine as a Measure of Embedding Similarity for High Frequency Wordscited by 49
  11. 2020On the Interplay Between Fine-tuning and Sentence-level Probing for Linguistic Knowledge in Pre-trained Transformerscited by 39
  12. 2023The Shape of Learning: Anisotropy and Intrinsic Dimensions in Transformer-Based Modelscited by 39
5 more
  1. 2021How Does Fine-tuning Affect the Geometry of Embedding Space: A Case Study on Isotropycited by 23
  2. 2023Stable Anisotropic Regularizationcited by 12
  3. 2022Isotropic Representation Can Improve Dense Retrievalcited by 8
  4. 2023Is Anisotropy Inherent to Transformers?cited by 5
  5. 2023A Comparative Study of Sentence Embedding Models for Assessing Semantic Variationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.