mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Opt-Out: Investigating Entity-Level Unlearning for Large Language Models via Optimal Transport

arXiv 2406.12329 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 10

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction-following large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, have become widely popular among everyday users. However, these models inadvertently disclose private, sensitive information to their users, underscoring the need for machine unlearning techniques to remove selective information from the models. While prior work has focused on forgetting small, random subsets of training data at the instance-level, we argue that real-world scenarios often require the removal of an entire user data, which may require a more careful maneuver. In this study, we explore entity-level unlearning, which aims to erase all knowledge related to a target entity while preserving the remaining model capabilities. To address this, we introduce Opt-Out, an optimal transport-based unlearning method that utilizes the Wasserstein distance from the model's initial parameters to achieve more effective and fine-grained unlearning. We also present the first Entity-Level Unlearning Dataset (ELUDe) designed to evaluate entity-level unlearning. Our empirical results demonstrate that Opt-Out surpasses existing methods, establishing a new standard for secure and adaptable LLMs that can accommodate user data removal requests without the need for full retraining.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 27 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.

Builds on

27 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  2. 2023Unlearn What You Want to Forget: Efficient Unlearning for LLMs31 Oct
  3. 2023KGA: A General Machine Unlearning Framework Based on Knowledge Gap Alignment11 May
  4. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct

Other references · 23

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  7. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  8. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  9. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  10. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  11. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  12. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
11 more
  1. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  2. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
  3. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
  4. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  5. 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 960
  6. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
  7. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
  8. 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 254
  9. 2020Forgetting Outside the Box: Scrubbing Deep Networks of Information Accessible from Input-Output Observationscited by 171
  10. 2019Learning Dense Representations for Entity Retrievalcited by 122
  11. 2022Kernelized Concept Erasurecited by 47

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

10 papers.