SFedCA: Credit Assignment-Based Active Client Selection Strategy for Spiking Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spiking federated learning is an emerging distributed learning paradigm that allows resource-constrained devices to train collaboratively at low power consumption without exchanging local data. It takes advantage of both the privacy computation property in federated learning (FL) and the energy efficiency in spiking neural networks (SNN). Thus, it is highly promising to revolutionize the efficient processing of multimedia data. However, existing spiking federated learning methods employ a random selection approach for client aggregation, assuming unbiased client participation. This neglect of statistical heterogeneity affects the convergence and accuracy of the global model significantly. In our work, we propose a credit assignment-based active client selection strategy, the SFedCA, to judiciously aggregate clients that contribute to the global sample distribution balance. Specifically, the client credits are assigned by the firing intensity state before and after local model training, which reflects the local data distribution difference from the global model. Comprehensive experiments are conducted on various non-identical and independent distribution (non-IID) scenarios. The experimental results demonstrate that the SFedCA outperforms the existing state-of-the-art spiking federated learning methods, and requires fewer communication rounds.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.
Builds on
18 of 55 references.
References · 18
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
- 2022Spikformer: When Spiking Neural Network Meets Transformercited by 263
- 2018Direct Training for Spiking Neural Networks: Faster, Larger, Bettercited by 222
- 2016Training Deep Spiking Neural Networks using Backpropagationcited by 203
- 2023SpikingJelly: An open-source machine learning infrastructure platform for spike-based intelligencecited by 163
- 2019Active Federated Learningcited by 63
- 2022Client Selection in Federated Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 62
- 2021Towards Fairness-Aware Federated Learningcited by 57
6 more
- 2022Fed-CBS: A Heterogeneity-Aware Client Sampling Mechanism for Federated Learning via Class-Imbalance Reductioncited by 32
- 2021Human-Level Control through Directly-Trained Deep Spiking Q-Networkscited by 23
- 2022Exploring Temporal Information Dynamics in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 23
- 2021Federated Learning with Spiking Neural Networkscited by 22
- 2019Federated Neuromorphic Learning of Spiking Neural Networks for Low-Power Edge Intelligencecited by 16
- 2021PrivateSNN: Privacy-Preserving Spiking Neural Networkscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.