mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FullCert: Deterministic End-to-End Certification for Training and Inference of Neural Networks

arXiv 2406.11522 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern machine learning models are sensitive to the manipulation of both the training data (poisoning attacks) and inference data (adversarial examples). Recognizing this issue, the community has developed many empirical defenses against both attacks and, more recently, certification methods with provable guarantees against inference-time attacks. However, such guarantees are still largely lacking for training-time attacks. In this work, we present FullCert, the first end-to-end certifier with sound, deterministic bounds, which proves robustness against both training-time and inference-time attacks. We first bound all possible perturbations an adversary can make to the training data under the considered threat model. Using these constraints, we bound the perturbations' influence on the model's parameters. Finally, we bound the impact of these parameter changes on the model's prediction, resulting in joint robustness guarantees against poisoning and adversarial examples. To facilitate this novel certification paradigm, we combine our theoretical work with a new open-source library BoundFlow, which enables model training on bounded datasets. We experimentally demonstrate FullCert's feasibility on two datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2024.

Builds on

25 of 38 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
  7. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
  8. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
  9. 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 254
  10. 2018Backdoor Embedding in Convolutional Neural Network Models via Invisible Perturbationcited by 131
  11. 2022(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!cited by 130
  12. 2018Stronger Data Poisoning Attacks Break Data Sanitization Defensescited by 125
13 more
  1. 2020RAB: Provable Robustness Against Backdoor Attackscited by 115
  2. 2020Deep Partition Aggregation: Provable Defense against General Poisoning Attackscited by 112
  3. 2020Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attackscited by 109
  4. 2020Certified Robustness to Label-Flipping Attacks via Randomized Smoothingcited by 103
  5. 2022Complete Verification via Multi-Neuron Relaxation Guided Branch-and-Boundcited by 92
  6. 2020Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 90
  7. 2016Towards the Science of Security and Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 89
  8. 2020On Certifying Robustness against Backdoor Attacks via Randomized Smoothingcited by 74
  9. 2020Certified Robustness of Nearest Neighbors against Data Poisoning and Backdoor Attackscited by 58
  10. 2018CNN-Cert: An Efficient Framework for Certifying Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 50
  11. 2022Improved Certified Defenses against Data Poisoning with (Deterministic) Finite Aggregationcited by 50
  12. 2022BagFlip: A Certified Defense against Data Poisoningcited by 18
  13. 2023Temporal Robustness against Data Poisoningcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.