mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Text Grafting: Near-Distribution Weak Supervision for Minority Classes in Text Classification

arXiv 2406.11115 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For extremely weak-supervised text classification, pioneer research generates pseudo labels by mining texts similar to the class names from the raw corpus, which may end up with very limited or even no samples for the minority classes. Recent works have started to generate the relevant texts by prompting LLMs using the class names or definitions; however, there is a high risk that LLMs cannot generate in-distribution (i.e., similar to the corpus where the text classifier will be applied) data, leading to ungeneralizable classifiers. In this paper, we combine the advantages of these two approaches and propose to bridge the gap via a novel framework, text grafting, which aims to obtain clean and near-distribution weak supervision for minority classes. Specifically, we first use LLM-based logits to mine masked templates from the raw corpus, which have a high potential for data synthesis into the target minority class. Then, the templates are filled by state-of-the-art LLMs to synthesize near-distribution texts falling into minority classes. Text grafting shows significant improvement over direct mining or synthesis on minority classes. We also use analysis and case studies to comprehend the property of text grafting.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2024.

Builds on

30 of 51 references.

References · 30

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  5. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  6. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
  7. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
  8. 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 916
  9. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
  10. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
  11. 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 417
  12. 2021Deep Long-Tailed Learning: A Surveycited by 417
18 more
  1. 2020CLUE: A Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 278
  2. 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 263
  3. 2022ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generationcited by 211
  4. 2019BIGPATENT: A Large-Scale Dataset for Abstractive and Coherent Summarizationcited by 156
  5. 2015Relay Backpropagation for Effective Learning of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 115
  6. 2023OUTFOX: LLM-Generated Essay Detection Through In-Context Learning with Adversarially Generated Examplescited by 80
  7. 2022ProGen: Progressive Zero-shot Dataset Generation via In-context Feedbackcited by 67
  8. 2022Prototypical Calibration for Few-shot Learning of Language Modelscited by 58
  9. 2020X-Class: Text Classification with Extremely Weak Supervisioncited by 46
  10. 2021Generate, Annotate, and Learn: NLP with Synthetic Textcited by 42
  11. 2022Pre-trained Language Models Can be Fully Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 22
  12. 2020A little goes a long way: Improving toxic language classification despite data scarcitycited by 12
  13. 2022LOPS: Learning Order Inspired Pseudo-Label Selection for Weakly Supervised Text Classificationcited by 11
  14. 2020Supercharging Imbalanced Data Learning With Energy-based Contrastive Representation Transfercited by 8
  15. 2022Counterfactual Data Augmentation improves Factuality of Abstractive Summarizationcited by 8
  16. 2023A Benchmark on Extremely Weakly Supervised Text Classification: Reconcile Seed Matching and Prompting Approachescited by 6
  17. 2024Incubating Text Classifiers Following User Instruction with Nothing but LLMcited by 6
  18. 2023Debiasing Made State-of-the-art: Revisiting the Simple Seed-based Weak Supervision for Text Classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.