HiddenTables & PyQTax: A Cooperative Game and Dataset For TableQA to Ensure Scale and Data Privacy Across a Myriad of Taxonomies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A myriad of different Large Language Models (LLMs) face a common challenge in contextually analyzing table question-answering tasks. These challenges are engendered from (1) finite context windows for large tables, (2) multi-faceted discrepancies amongst tokenization patterns against cell boundaries, and (3) various limitations stemming from data confidentiality in the process of using external models such as gpt-3.5-turbo. We propose a cooperative game dubbed "HiddenTables" as a potential resolution to this challenge. In essence, "HiddenTables" is played between the code-generating LLM "Solver" and the "Oracle" which evaluates the ability of the LLM agents to solve Table QA tasks. This game is based on natural language schemas and importantly, ensures the security of the underlying data. We provide evidential experiments on a diverse set of tables that demonstrate an LLM's collective inability to generalize and perform on complex queries, handle compositional dependencies, and align natural language to programmatic commands when concrete table schemas are provided. Unlike encoder-based models, we have pushed the boundaries of "HiddenTables" to not be limited by the number of rows - therefore we exhibit improved efficiency in prompt and completion tokens. Our infrastructure has spawned a new dataset "PyQTax" that spans across 116,671 question-table-answer triplets and provides additional fine-grained breakdowns & labels for varying question taxonomies. Therefore, in tandem with our academic contributions regarding LLMs' deficiency in TableQA tasks, "HiddenTables" is a tactile manifestation of how LLMs can interact with massive datasets while ensuring data security and minimizing generation costs.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2024.
Builds on
20 of 43 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,210
- 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
- 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Modelscited by 886
8 more
- 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 606
- 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 515
- 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
- 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 398
- 2021TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL Executorcited by 235
- 2022Binding Language Models in Symbolic Languagescited by 228
- 2020GraPPa: Grammar-Augmented Pre-Training for Table Semantic Parsingcited by 171
- 2024FlowMind: Automatic Workflow Generation with LLMscited by 30
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024LAW: Legal Agentic Workflows for Custody and Fund Services Contractscited by 6
- 2024FISHNET: Financial Intelligence from Sub-querying, Harmonizing, Neural-Conditioning, Expert Swarms, and Task Planningcited by 5
- 2025MultiQ&A: An Analysis in Measuring Robustness via Automated Crowdsourcing of Question Perturbations and Answerscited by 2
- 2025QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation: Exploiting Semantic Features for No-Regret Rewritingcited by 1
- 2025TASER: Table Agents for Schema-guided Extraction and Recommendationcited by 0
- 2026No One Size Fits All: QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigationcited by 0
- 2026No One Size Fits All: QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation23 Feb 2026
- 2025QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation: Exploiting Semantic Features for No-Regret Rewriting22 Aug 2025
- 2025TASER: Table Agents for Schema-guided Extraction and Recommendation18 Aug 2025
- 2025MultiQ&A: An Analysis in Measuring Robustness via Automated Crowdsourcing of Question Perturbations and Answers6 Feb 2025
- 2024LAW: Legal Agentic Workflows for Custody and Fund Services Contracts15 Dec 2024
- 2024FISHNET: Financial Intelligence from Sub-querying, Harmonizing, Neural-Conditioning, Expert Swarms, and Task Planning25 Oct 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026MATA: Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable and Flexible Table Question Answering
- 2026QUIETT: Query-Independent Table Transformation for Robust Reasoning
- 2026DataFactory: Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Advanced Table Question Answering
- 2025Agentic LLMs for Question Answering over Tabular Data
- 2025TableZoomer: A Collaborative Agent Framework for Large-scale Table Question Answering
- 2025Table Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Tasks, Methods, and Evaluation
- 2025Improving Table Understanding with LLMs and Entity-Oriented Search
- 2024TANQ: An open domain dataset of table answered questions