mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SparseCL: Sparse Contrastive Learning for Contradiction Retrieval

arXiv 2406.10746 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.IRcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contradiction retrieval refers to identifying and extracting documents that explicitly disagree with or refute the content of a query, which is important to many downstream applications like fact checking and data cleaning. To retrieve contradiction argument to the query from large document corpora, existing methods such as similarity search and crossencoder models exhibit significant limitations. The former struggles to capture the essence of contradiction due to its inherent nature of favoring similarity, while the latter suffers from computational inefficiency, especially when the size of corpora is large. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel approach: SparseCL that leverages specially trained sentence embeddings designed to preserve subtle, contradictory nuances between sentences. Our method utilizes a combined metric of cosine similarity and a sparsity function to efficiently identify and retrieve documents that contradict a given query. This approach dramatically enhances the speed of contradiction detection by reducing the need for exhaustive document comparisons to simple vector calculations. We validate our model using the Arguana dataset, a benchmark dataset specifically geared towards contradiction retrieval, as well as synthetic contradictions generated from the MSMARCO and HotpotQA datasets using GPT-4. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of our approach not only in contradiction retrieval with more than 30% accuracy improvements on MSMARCO and HotpotQA across different model architectures but also in applications such as cleaning corrupted corpora to restore high-quality QA retrieval. This paper outlines a promising direction for improving the accuracy and efficiency of contradiction retrieval in large-scale text corpora.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2024.

Builds on

20 of 32 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  4. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  5. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  6. 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
  7. 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 705
  8. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
  9. 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 402
  10. 2021Get Your Vitamin C! Robust Fact Verification with Contrastive Evidencecited by 222
  11. 2023Poisoning Retrieval Corpora by Injecting Adversarial Passagescited by 153
  12. 2023Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentationcited by 146
8 more
  1. 2022Task-aware Retrieval with Instructionscited by 107
  2. 2023AnglE-optimized Text Embeddingscited by 98
  3. 2020FakeCovid -- A Multilingual Cross-domain Fact Check News Dataset for COVID-19cited by 60
  4. 2020Out of the Echo Chamber: Detecting Countering Debate Speechescited by 15
  5. 2024BIRCO: A Benchmark of Information Retrieval Tasks with Complex Objectivescited by 15
  6. 2022A Universal Discriminator for Zero-Shot Generalizationcited by 11
  7. 2022Learning to Detect Noisy Labels Using Model-Based Featurescited by 6
  8. 2023Revisiting the Role of Similarity and Dissimilarity in Best Counter Argument Retrievalcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.