mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fast solution to the fair ranking problem using the Sinkhorn algorithm

arXiv 2406.10262 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2024cs.IR cs.AI math.OCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In two-sided marketplaces such as online flea markets, recommender systems for providing consumers with personalized item rankings play a key role in promoting transactions between providers and consumers. Meanwhile, two-sided marketplaces face the problem of balancing consumer satisfaction and fairness among items to stimulate activity of item providers. Saito and Joachims (2022) devised an impact-based fair ranking method for maximizing the Nash social welfare based on fair division; however, this method, which requires solving a large-scale constrained nonlinear optimization problem, is very difficult to apply to practical-scale recommender systems. We thus propose a fast solution to the impact-based fair ranking problem. We first transform the fair ranking problem into an unconstrained optimization problem and then design a gradient ascent method that repeatedly executes the Sinkhorn algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that our algorithm provides fair rankings of high quality and is about 1000 times faster than application of commercial optimization software.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2024.

Builds on

8 of 10 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  3. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 190
  4. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  5. 2020FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platformscited by 78
  6. 2021Fairness in Rankings and Recommendations: An Overviewcited by 62
  7. 2022Fair Ranking as Fair Division: Impact-Based Individual Fairness in Rankingcited by 13
  8. 2024Scalable and Provably Fair Exposure Control for Large-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.