mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Question Answering on Charts Through Effective Pre-training Tasks

arXiv 2406.10085 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To completely understand a document, the use of textual information is not enough. Understanding visual cues, such as layouts and charts, is also required. While the current state-of-the-art approaches for document understanding (both OCR-based and OCR-free) work well, a thorough analysis of their capabilities and limitations has not yet been performed. Therefore, in this work, we addresses the limitation of current VisualQA models when applied to charts and plots. To investigate shortcomings of the state-of-the-art models, we conduct a comprehensive behavioral analysis, using ChartQA as a case study. Our findings indicate that existing models particularly underperform in answering questions related to the chart's structural and visual context, as well as numerical information. To address these issues, we propose three simple pre-training tasks that enforce the existing model in terms of both structural-visual knowledge, as well as its understanding of numerical questions. We evaluate our pre-trained model (called MatCha-v2) on three chart datasets - both extractive and abstractive question datasets - and observe that it achieves an average improvement of 1.7% over the baseline model.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2024.

Builds on

16 of 20 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  4. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
  5. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  6. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
  7. 2021Unifying Vision-and-Language Tasks via Text Generationcited by 411
  8. 2019PlotQA: Reasoning over Scientific Plotscited by 317
  9. 2022UL2: Unifying Language Learning Paradigmscited by 292
  10. 2023UniChart: A Universal Vision-language Pretrained Model for Chart Comprehension and Reasoningcited by 158
  11. 2018Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretations Difficultcited by 140
  12. 2022MatCha: Enhancing Visual Language Pretraining with Math Reasoning and Chart Derenderingcited by 132
4 more
  1. 2018On Adversarial Examples for Character-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 85
  2. 2022OpenCQA: Open-ended Question Answering with Chartscited by 60
  3. 2021Just What do You Think You're Doing, Dave?' A Checklist for Responsible Data Use in NLPcited by 47
  4. 2021BERT & Family Eat Word Salad: Experiments with Text Understandingcited by 44

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.