mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Slow Signs in High-fidelity Model Extraction

arXiv 2406.10011 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks, costly to train and rich in intellectual property value, are increasingly threatened by model extraction attacks that compromise their confidentiality. Previous attacks have succeeded in reverse-engineering model parameters up to a precision of float64 for models trained on random data with at most three hidden layers using cryptanalytical techniques. However, the process was identified to be very time consuming and not feasible for larger and deeper models trained on standard benchmarks. Our study evaluates the feasibility of parameter extraction methods of Carlini et al. [1] further enhanced by Canales-Mart'inez et al. [2] for models trained on standard benchmarks. We introduce a unified codebase that integrates previous methods and reveal that computational tools can significantly influence performance. We develop further optimisations to the end-to-end attack and improve the efficiency of extracting weight signs by up to 14.8 times compared to former methods through the identification of easier and harder to extract neurons. Contrary to prior assumptions, we identify extraction of weights, not extraction of weight signs, as the critical bottleneck. With our improvements, a 16,721 parameter model with 2 hidden layers trained on MNIST is extracted within only 98 minutes compared to at least 150 minutes previously. Finally, addressing methodological deficiencies observed in previous studies, we propose new ways of robust benchmarking for future model extraction attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2024.

Builds on

16 of 21 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  2. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
  3. 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
  4. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 208
  5. 2020Data-Free Model Extractioncited by 121
  6. 2018Model Reconstruction from Model Explanationscited by 84
  7. 2019Reverse-Engineering Deep ReLU Networkscited by 81
  8. 2022I Know What You Trained Last Summer: A Survey on Stealing Machine Learning Models and Defencescited by 75
  9. 2020Cryptanalytic Extraction of Neural Network Modelscited by 65
  10. 2020Hermes Attack: Steal DNN Models with Lossless Inference Accuracycited by 41
  11. 2023Polynomial Time Cryptanalytic Extraction of Neural Network Modelscited by 17
  12. 2023Expand-and-Cluster: Parameter Recovery of Neural Networkscited by 15
4 more
  1. 2018CSI Neural Network: Using Side-channels to Recover Your Artificial Neural Network Informationcited by 9
  2. 2023Beyond Labeling Oracles: What does it mean to steal ML models?cited by 4
  3. 2021Copycat CNN: Are Random Non-Labeled Data Enough to Steal Knowledge from Black-box Models?cited by 3
  4. 2023InferNet: Exploiting Aggregate GPU Profiles as Side-Channel for DNN Architecture Inferencecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

7 papers.