mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Positive-Unlabelled Learning for identifying new candidate Dietary Restriction-related genes among Ageing-related genes

arXiv 2406.09898 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2024cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dietary Restriction (DR) is one of the most popular anti-ageing interventions; recently, Machine Learning (ML) has been explored to identify potential DR-related genes among ageing-related genes, aiming to minimize costly wet lab experiments needed to expand our knowledge on DR. However, to train a model from positive (DR-related) and negative (non-DR-related) examples, the existing ML approach naively labels genes without known DR relation as negative examples, assuming that lack of DR-related annotation for a gene represents evidence of absence of DR-relatedness, rather than absence of evidence. This hinders the reliability of the negative examples (non-DR-related genes) and the method's ability to identify novel DR-related genes. This work introduces a novel gene prioritisation method based on the two-step Positive-Unlabelled (PU) Learning paradigm: using a similarity-based, KNN-inspired approach, our method first selects reliable negative examples among the genes without known DR associations. Then, these reliable negatives and all known positives are used to train a classifier that effectively differentiates DR-related and non-DR-related genes, which is finally employed to generate a more reliable ranking of promising genes for novel DR-relatedness. Our method significantly outperforms (p<0.05) the existing state-of-the-art approach in three predictive accuracy metrics with up to 40% lower computational cost in the best case, and we identify 4 new promising DR-related genes (PRKAB1, PRKAB2, IRS2, PRKAG1), all with evidence from the existing literature supporting their potential DR-related role.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2024.

Builds on

6 of 70 references.

References · 6

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
  3. 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
  4. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  5. 2022Evaluating the Predictive Performance of Positive-Unlabelled Classifiers: a brief critical review and practical recommendations for improvementcited by 4
  6. 2024Verifying the Selected Completely at Random Assumption in Positive-Unlabeled Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.