mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Temporal Planning via Interval Logic Satisfiability for Autonomous Systems

arXiv 2406.09661 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2024cs.LO cs.AI cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many automated planning methods and formulations rely on suitably designed abstractions or simplifications of the constrained dynamics associated with agents to attain computational scalability. We consider formulations of temporal planning where intervals are associated with both action and fluent atoms, and relations between these are given as sentences in Allen's Interval Logic. We propose a notion of planning graphs that can account for complex concurrency relations between actions and fluents as a Constraint Programming (CP) model. We test an implementation of our algorithm on a state-of-the-art framework for CP and compare it with PDDL 2.1 planners that capture plans requiring complex concurrent interactions between agents. We demonstrate our algorithm outperforms existing PDDL 2.1 planners in the case studies. Still, scalability remains challenging when plans must comply with intricate concurrent interactions and the sequencing of actions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2024.

Builds on

2 of 52 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020FAPE: a Constraint-based Planner for Generative and Hierarchical Temporal Planningcited by 4
  2. 2022HDDL 2.1: Towards Defining an HTN Formalism with Timecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.