Beyond the Calibration Point: Mechanism Comparison in Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In differentially private (DP) machine learning, the privacy guarantees of DP mechanisms are often reported and compared on the basis of a single (varepsilon, δ)-pair. This practice overlooks that DP guarantees can vary substantially even between mechanisms sharing a given (varepsilon, δ), and potentially introduces privacy vulnerabilities which can remain undetected. This motivates the need for robust, rigorous methods for comparing DP guarantees in such cases. Here, we introduce the Delta-divergence between mechanisms which quantifies the worst-case excess privacy vulnerability of choosing one mechanism over another in terms of (varepsilon, δ), f-DP and in terms of a newly presented Bayesian interpretation. Moreover, as a generalisation of the Blackwell theorem, it is endowed with strong decision-theoretic foundations. Through application examples, we show that our techniques can facilitate informed decision-making and reveal gaps in the current understanding of privacy risks, as current practices in DP-SGD often result in choosing mechanisms with high excess privacy vulnerabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2024.
Builds on
14 of 27 references.
References · 14
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 218
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
- 2022Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversariescited by 143
- 2020Tempered Sigmoid Activations for Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 121
- 2020Revisiting Membership Inference Under Realistic Assumptionscited by 108
- 2019Hypothesis Testing Interpretations and Renyi Differential Privacycited by 84
- 2021Optimal Accounting of Differential Privacy via Characteristic Functioncited by 83
- 2022Connect the Dots: Tighter Discrete Approximations of Privacy Loss Distributionscited by 50
- 2023Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in DP-SGDcited by 42
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2025Unifying Re-Identification, Attribute Inference, and Data Reconstruction Risks in Differential Privacycited by 11
- 2025Gaussian DP for Reporting Differential Privacy Guarantees in Machine Learningcited by 6
- 2025The Hitchhiker's Guide to Efficient, End-to-End, and Tight DP Auditingcited by 4
- 2025Empirical Privacy Variancecited by 3
- 2026Your Privacy Depends on Others: Collusion Vulnerabilities in Individual Differential Privacycited by 1
- 2026Beyond Theoretical Bounds: Empirical Privacy Loss Calibration for Text Rewriting Under Local Differential Privacycited by 0
- 2026Memorization Is Not Extraction: Tight Differential-Privacy Bounds and Audit Blind Spotscited by 0
- 2026Pushing the (Decision) Boundaries: Dynamically Calibrating Differentially Private Noise to Explainability in Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026Pushing the (Decision) Boundaries: Dynamically Calibrating Differentially Private Noise to Explainability in Federated Learning3 Sep 2026
- 2026Memorization Is Not Extraction: Tight Differential-Privacy Bounds and Audit Blind Spots27 Aug 2026
- 2026Beyond Theoretical Bounds: Empirical Privacy Loss Calibration for Text Rewriting Under Local Differential Privacy24 Mar 2026
- 2026Your Privacy Depends on Others: Collusion Vulnerabilities in Individual Differential Privacy19 Jan 2026
- 2025Unifying Re-Identification, Attribute Inference, and Data Reconstruction Risks in Differential Privacy9 Jul 2025
- 2025The Hitchhiker's Guide to Efficient, End-to-End, and Tight DP Auditing20 Jun 2025
- 2025Empirical Privacy Variance16 Mar 2025
- 2025Gaussian DP for Reporting Differential Privacy Guarantees in Machine Learning13 Mar 2025