How Powerful is Graph Filtering for Recommendation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It has been shown that the effectiveness of graph convolutional network (GCN) for recommendation is attributed to the spectral graph filtering. Most GCN-based methods consist of a graph filter or followed by a low-rank mapping optimized based on supervised training. However, we show two limitations suppressing the power of graph filtering: (1) Lack of generality. Due to the varied noise distribution, graph filters fail to denoise sparse data where noise is scattered across all frequencies, while supervised training results in worse performance on dense data where noise is concentrated in middle frequencies that can be removed by graph filters without training. (2) Lack of expressive power. We theoretically show that linear GCN (LGCN) that is effective on collaborative filtering (CF) cannot generate arbitrary embeddings, implying the possibility that optimal data representation might be unreachable. To tackle the first limitation, we show close relation between noise distribution and the sharpness of spectrum where a sharper spectral distribution is more desirable causing data noise to be separable from important features without training. Based on this observation, we propose a generalized graph normalization G^2N to adjust the sharpness of spectral distribution in order to redistribute data noise to assure that it can be removed by graph filtering without training. As for the second limitation, we propose an individualized graph filter (IGF) adapting to the different confidence levels of the user preference that interactions can reflect, which is proved to be able to generate arbitrary embeddings. By simplifying LGCN, we further propose a simplified graph filtering (SGFCF) which only requires the top-K singular values for recommendation. Finally, experimental results on four datasets with different density settings demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed methods.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2025Graph Spectral Filtering with Chebyshev Interpolation for Recommendationcited by 7
- 2024S-Diff: An Anisotropic Diffusion Model for Collaborative Filtering in Spectral Domaincited by 5
- 2024Towards Unified and Adaptive Cross-Domain Collaborative Filtering via Graph Signal Processingcited by 1
- 2025LLM-Enhanced Linear Autoencoders for Recommendationcited by 1
- 2026Memory Is No Longer a Bottleneck: Memory-Efficient Graph Filtering for Scalable Collaborative Filteringcited by 1
- 2025Towards A Tri-View Diffusion Framework for Recommendationcited by 0
- 2025How Do Graph Signals Affect Recommendation: Unveiling the Mystery of Low and High-Frequency Graph Signalscited by 0
- 2026Stochastic Sequential Decision Making over Expanding Networks with Graph Filteringcited by 0
- 2026Memory Is No Longer a Bottleneck: Memory-Efficient Graph Filtering for Scalable Collaborative Filtering19 Jun 2026
- 2026Stochastic Sequential Decision Making over Expanding Networks with Graph Filtering19 Mar 2026
- 2025How Do Graph Signals Affect Recommendation: Unveiling the Mystery of Low and High-Frequency Graph Signals10 Dec 2025
- 2025Towards A Tri-View Diffusion Framework for Recommendation25 Nov 2025
- 2025LLM-Enhanced Linear Autoencoders for Recommendation19 Aug 2025
- 2025Graph Spectral Filtering with Chebyshev Interpolation for Recommendation1 May 2025
- 2024S-Diff: An Anisotropic Diffusion Model for Collaborative Filtering in Spectral Domain31 Dec 2024
- 2024Towards Unified and Adaptive Cross-Domain Collaborative Filtering via Graph Signal Processing17 Jul 2024