mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LLM-based Knowledge Pruning for Time Series Data Analytics on Edge-computing Devices

arXiv 2406.08765 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2024cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Limited by the scale and diversity of time series data, the neural networks trained on time series data often overfit and show unsatisfacotry performances. In comparison, large language models (LLMs) recently exhibit impressive generalization in diverse fields. Although massive LLM based approaches are proposed for time series tasks, these methods require to load the whole LLM in both training and reference. This high computational demands limit practical applications in resource-constrained settings, like edge-computing and IoT devices. To address this issue, we propose Knowledge Pruning (KP), a novel paradigm for time series learning in this paper. For a specific downstream task, we argue that the world knowledge learned by LLMs is much redundant and only the related knowledge termed as "pertinent knowledge" is useful. Unlike other methods, our KP targets to prune the redundant knowledge and only distill the pertinent knowledge into the target model. This reduces model size and computational costs significantly. Additionally, different from existing LLM based approaches, our KP does not require to load the LLM in the process of training and testing, further easing computational burdens. With our proposed KP, a lightweight network can effectively learn the pertinent knowledge, achieving satisfactory performances with a low computation cost. To verify the effectiveness of our KP, two fundamental tasks on edge-computing devices are investigated in our experiments, where eight diverse environments or benchmarks with different networks are used to verify the generalization of our KP. Through experiments, our KP demonstrates effective learning of pertinent knowledge, achieving notable performance improvements in regression (19.7% on average) and classification (up to 13.7%) tasks, showcasing state-of-the-art results.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2024.

Builds on

14 of 39 references.

References · 14

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  4. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  5. 2023Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Modelscited by 680
  6. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 676
  7. 2023One Fits All:Power General Time Series Analysis by Pretrained LMcited by 615
  8. 2023Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasterscited by 491
  9. 2022PromptCast: A New Prompt-based Learning Paradigm for Time Series Forecastingcited by 170
  10. 2023TEMPO: Prompt-based Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Time Series Forecastingcited by 170
  11. 2023TEST: Text Prototype Aligned Embedding to Activate LLM's Ability for Time Seriescited by 165
  12. 2023Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Predictive Learning in Urban Computing: A Surveycited by 140
2 more
  1. 2023Foundational Models Defining a New Era in Vision: A Survey and Outlookcited by 109
  2. 2023Large Models for Time Series and Spatio-Temporal Data: A Survey and Outlookcited by 109

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4.

6 papers.