mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Individual Packet Features are a Risk to Model Generalisation in ML-Based Intrusion Detection

arXiv 2406.07578 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.NIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning is increasingly used for intrusion detection in IoT networks. This paper explores the effectiveness of using individual packet features (IPF), which are attributes extracted from a single network packet, such as timing, size, and source-destination information. Through literature review and experiments, we identify the limitations of IPF, showing they can produce misleadingly high detection rates. Our findings emphasize the need for approaches that consider packet interactions for robust intrusion detection. Additionally, we demonstrate that models based on IPF often fail to generalize across datasets, compromising their reliability in diverse IoT environments.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2024.

Builds on

4 of 22 references.

References · 4

  1. 2018Kitsune: An Ensemble of Autoencoders for Online Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 121
  2. 2018Towards the Development of Realistic Botnet Dataset in the Internet of Things for Network Forensic Analytics: Bot-IoT Datasetcited by 98
  3. 2018How Complex is your classification problem? A survey on measuring classification complexitycited by 66
  4. 2023IoTGeM: Generalizable Models for Behaviour-Based IoT Attack Detectioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.