Mitigating Bias in Dataset Distillation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dataset Distillation has emerged as a technique for compressing large datasets into smaller synthetic counterparts, facilitating downstream training tasks. In this paper, we study the impact of bias inside the original dataset on the performance of dataset distillation. With a comprehensive empirical evaluation on canonical datasets with color, corruption and background biases, we found that color and background biases in the original dataset will be amplified through the distillation process, resulting in a notable decline in the performance of models trained on the distilled dataset, while corruption bias is suppressed through the distillation process. To reduce bias amplification in dataset distillation, we introduce a simple yet highly effective approach based on a sample reweighting scheme utilizing kernel density estimation. Empirical results on multiple real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Notably, on CMNIST with 5% bias-conflict ratio and IPC 50, our method achieves 91.5% test accuracy compared to 23.8% from vanilla DM, boosting the performance by 67.7%, whereas applying state-of-the-art debiasing method on the same dataset only achieves 53.7% accuracy. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing biases in dataset distillation and provide a promising avenue to address bias amplification in the process.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2024.
Builds on
47 of 59 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2022Dataset Distillation by Matching Training Trajectoriescited by 437
- 2021Dataset Condensation with Distribution Matchingcited by 362
- 2021Dataset Condensation with Differentiable Siamese Augmentationcited by 290
- 2020Dataset Meta-Learning from Kernel Ridge-Regressioncited by 230
35 more
- 2022Dataset Condensation via Efficient Synthetic-Data Parameterizationcited by 187
- 2022Scaling Up Dataset Distillation to ImageNet-1K with Constant Memorycited by 180
- 2022Dataset Distillation using Neural Feature Regressioncited by 177
- 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
- 2021Graph Condensation for Graph Neural Networkscited by 150
- 2022Minimizing the Accumulated Trajectory Error to Improve Dataset Distillationcited by 142
- 2023Squeeze, Recover and Relabel: Dataset Condensation at ImageNet Scale From A New Perspectivecited by 136
- 2023Generalizing Dataset Distillation via Deep Generative Priorcited by 125
- 2023Improved Distribution Matching for Dataset Condensationcited by 124
- 2023Towards Lossless Dataset Distillation via Difficulty-Aligned Trajectory Matchingcited by 118
- 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
- 2022Dataset Distillation via Factorizationcited by 115
- 2022Efficient Dataset Distillation Using Random Feature Approximationcited by 111
- 2023On the Diversity and Realism of Distilled Dataset: An Efficient Dataset Distillation Paradigmcited by 107
- 2022Remember the Past: Distilling Datasets into Addressable Memories for Neural Networkscited by 104
- 2019Generative Teaching Networks: Accelerating Neural Architecture Search by Learning to Generate Synthetic Training Datacited by 103
- 2023DREAM: Efficient Dataset Distillation by Representative Matchingcited by 93
- 2021Rethinking Architecture Selection in Differentiable NAScited by 92
- 2019Benchmarking Attribution Methods with Relative Feature Importancecited by 89
- 2015A Deeper Look at Dataset Biascited by 86
- 2023DataDAM: Efficient Dataset Distillation with Attention Matchingcited by 83
- 2022FedDM: Iterative Distribution Matching for Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 65
- 2023M3D: Dataset Condensation by Minimizing Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 49
- 2023Dataset Distillation with Convexified Implicit Gradientscited by 46
- 2023DiM: Distilling Dataset into Generative Modelcited by 45
- 2023Sequential Subset Matching for Dataset Distillationcited by 40
- 2022Dataset Condensation with Latent Space Knowledge Factorization and Sharingcited by 34
- 2022SelecMix: Debiased Learning by Contradicting-pair Samplingcited by 29
- 2023Frequency Domain-based Dataset Distillationcited by 28
- 2024Navigating Complexity: Toward Lossless Graph Condensation via Expanding Window Matchingcited by 28
- 2024Graph Data Condensation via Self-expressive Graph Structure Reconstructioncited by 18
- 2023Dataset Condensation via Generative Modelcited by 15
- 2022Learning to Generate Synthetic Training Data using Gradient Matching and Implicit Differentiationcited by 11
- 2023Federated Learning on Virtual Heterogeneous Data with Local-global Distillationcited by 6
- 2023Embarassingly Simple Dataset Distillationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.