Determining the Number of Communities in Sparse and Imbalanced Settings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Community structures represent a crucial aspect of network analysis, and various methods have been developed to identify these communities. However, a common hurdle lies in determining the number of communities K, a parameter that often requires estimation in practice. Existing approaches for estimating K face two notable challenges: the weak community signal present in sparse networks and the imbalance in community sizes or edge densities that result in unequal per-community expected degree. We propose a spectral method based on a novel network operator whose spectral properties effectively overcome both challenges. This operator is a refined version of the non-backtracking operator, adapted from a "centered" adjacency matrix. Its leading eigenvalues are more concentrated than those of the adjacency matrix for sparse networks, while they also demonstrate enhanced signal under imbalance scenarios, a benefit attributed to the centering step. This is justified, either theoretically or numerically, under the null model K = 1, in both dense and ultra-sparse settings. A goodness-of-fit test based on the leading eigenvalue can be applied to determine the number of communities K.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Community detection with the Bethe-Hessiancited by 3
- 2024Community detection with the Bethe-Hessian5 Nov 2024