mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Understanding Task-agnostic Debiasing Through the Lenses of Intrinsic Bias and Forgetfulness

arXiv 2406.04146 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While task-agnostic debiasing provides notable generalizability and reduced reliance on downstream data, its impact on language modeling ability and the risk of relearning social biases from downstream task-specific data remain as the two most significant challenges when debiasing Pretrained Language Models (PLMs). The impact on language modeling ability can be alleviated given a high-quality and long-contextualized debiasing corpus, but there remains a deficiency in understanding the specifics of relearning biases. We empirically ascertain that the effectiveness of task-agnostic debiasing hinges on the quantitative bias level of both the task-specific data used for downstream applications and the debiased model. We empirically show that the lower bound of the bias level of the downstream fine-tuned model can be approximated by the bias level of the debiased model, in most practical cases. To gain more in-depth understanding about how the parameters of PLMs change during fine-tuning due to the forgetting issue of PLMs, we propose a novel framework which can Propagate Socially-fair Debiasing to Downstream Fine-tuning, ProSocialTuning. Our proposed framework can push the fine-tuned model to approach the bias lower bound during downstream fine-tuning, indicating that the ineffectiveness of debiasing can be alleviated by overcoming the forgetting issue through regularizing successfully debiased attention heads based on the PLMs' bias levels from stages of pretraining and debiasing.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2024.

Builds on

30 of 48 references.

References · 30

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  5. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  6. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
  7. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
  8. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
  9. 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 583
  10. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
  11. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 349
  12. 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 296
18 more
  1. 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
  2. 2017Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networkscited by 265
  3. 2020Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Modelscited by 224
  4. 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
  5. 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 211
  6. 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
  7. 2022A Fast Post-Training Pruning Framework for Transformerscited by 162
  8. 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
  9. 2023Mechanistically analyzing the effects of fine-tuning on procedurally defined taskscited by 115
  10. 2022Entropy-based Attention Regularization Frees Unintended Bias Mitigation from Listscited by 55
  11. 2022Debiasing isn't enough! -- On the Effectiveness of Debiasing MLMs and their Social Biases in Downstream Taskscited by 48
  12. 2023Double Descent Demystified: Identifying, Interpreting & Ablating the Sources of a Deep Learning Puzzlecited by 37
  13. 2019PAC-Bayes with Backpropcited by 36
  14. 2022Unified Detoxifying and Debiasing in Language Generation via Inference-time Adaptive Optimizationcited by 33
  15. 2022MABEL: Attenuating Gender Bias using Textual Entailment Datacited by 31
  16. 2023Should We Attend More or Less? Modulating Attention for Fairnesscited by 11
  17. 2023PAC-tuning:Fine-tuning Pretrained Language Models with PAC-driven Perturbed Gradient Descentcited by 10
  18. 2023On the Origins of Bias in NLP through the Lens of the Jim Codecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.