Towards Physically Consistent Deep Learning For Climate Model Parameterizations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Climate models play a critical role in understanding and projecting climate change. Due to their complexity, their horizontal resolution of about 40-100 km remains too coarse to resolve processes such as clouds and convection, which need to be approximated via parameterizations. These parameterizations are a major source of systematic errors and large uncertainties in climate projections. Deep learning (DL)-based parameterizations, trained on data from computationally expensive short, high-resolution simulations, have shown great promise for improving climate models in that regard. However, their lack of interpretability and tendency to learn spurious non-physical correlations result in reduced trust in the climate simulation. We propose an efficient supervised learning framework for DL-based parameterizations that leads to physically consistent models with improved interpretability and negligible computational overhead compared to standard supervised training. First, key features determining the target physical processes are uncovered. Subsequently, the neural network is fine-tuned using only those relevant features. We show empirically that our method robustly identifies a small subset of the inputs as actual physical drivers, therefore removing spurious non-physical relationships. This results in by design physically consistent and interpretable neural networks while maintaining the predictive performance of unconstrained black-box DL-based parameterizations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2024.
Builds on
13 of 48 references.
References · 13
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
- 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
- 2017Detecting causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasetscited by 244
- 2019Learning Sparse Nonparametric DAGscited by 207
- 2018Deep learning to represent sub-grid processes in climate modelscited by 156
- 2019Machine Learning for Stochastic Parameterization: Generative Adversarial Networks in the Lorenz '96 Modelcited by 45
- 2019Physically Interpretable Neural Networks for the Geosciences: Applications to Earth System Variabilitycited by 44
- 2020CASTLE: Regularization via Auxiliary Causal Graph Discoverycited by 41
- 2021Climate-Invariant Machine Learningcited by 24
- 2020Towards Physically-consistent, Data-driven Models of Convectioncited by 13
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.