LLM as a Scorer: The Impact of Output Order on Dialogue Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This research investigates the effect of prompt design on dialogue evaluation using large language models (LLMs). While LLMs are increasingly used for scoring various inputs, creating effective prompts for dialogue evaluation remains challenging due to model sensitivity and subjectivity in dialogue assessments. Our study experimented with different prompt structures, altering the sequence of output instructions and including explanatory reasons. We found that the order of presenting reasons and scores significantly influences LLMs' scoring, with a "reason-first" approach yielding more comprehensive evaluations. This insight is crucial for enhancing the accuracy and consistency of LLM-based evaluations.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2024.
Builds on
5 of 10 references.
References · 5
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2023Human-like Summarization Evaluation with ChatGPTcited by 126
- 2023Large Language Models are Not Yet Human-Level Evaluators for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 70
- 2023The language of prompting: What linguistic properties make a prompt successful?cited by 44
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.