mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Are PPO-ed Language Models Hackable?

arXiv 2406.02577 ↗First posted 28 May 2024cs.CL cs.CR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerous algorithms have been proposed to textitalign language models to remove undesirable behaviors. However, the challenges associated with a very large state space and creating a proper reward function often result in various jailbreaks. Our paper aims to examine this effect of reward in the controlled setting of positive sentiment language generation. Instead of online training of a reward model based on human feedback, we employ a statically learned sentiment classifier. We also consider a setting where our model's weights and activations are exposed to an end-user after training. We examine a pretrained GPT-2 through the lens of mechanistic interpretability before and after proximal policy optimization (PPO) has been applied to promote positive sentiment responses. Using these insights, we (1) attempt to "hack" the PPO-ed model to generate negative sentiment responses and (2) add a term to the reward function to try and alter `negative' weights.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2024.

Builds on

12 of 20 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  4. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  5. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  6. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
  7. 2015Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Bookscited by 1,043
  8. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 541
  9. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
  10. 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
  11. 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 264
  12. 2024A Mechanistic Understanding of Alignment Algorithms: A Case Study on DPO and Toxicitycited by 185

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Beyond Sparse Rewards: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Language Model Critique in Text Generation
  2. 2020Learning Rewards from Linguistic Feedback
  3. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences
  4. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling
  5. 2022Quark: Controllable Text Generation with Reinforced Unlearning
  6. 2026KARMA: Karma-Aligned Reward Model Adaptation
  7. 2026One Bias After Another: Mechanistic Reward Shaping and Persistent Biases in Language Reward Models
  8. 2024Exploring RL-based LLM Training for Formal Language Tasks with Programmed Rewards