mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

OTTAWA: Optimal TransporT Adaptive Word Aligner for Hallucination and Omission Translation Errors Detection

arXiv 2406.01919 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, there has been considerable attention on detecting hallucinations and omissions in Machine Translation (MT) systems. The two dominant approaches to tackle this task involve analyzing the MT system's internal states or relying on the output of external tools, such as sentence similarity or MT quality estimators. In this work, we introduce OTTAWA, a novel Optimal Transport (OT)-based word aligner specifically designed to enhance the detection of hallucinations and omissions in MT systems. Our approach explicitly models the missing alignments by introducing a "null" vector, for which we propose a novel one-side constrained OT setting to allow an adaptive null alignment. Our approach yields competitive results compared to state-of-the-art methods across 18 language pairs on the HalOmi benchmark. In addition, it shows promising features, such as the ability to distinguish between both error types and perform word-level detection without accessing the MT system's internal states.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2024.

Builds on

21 of 50 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  4. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  6. 2021Word Alignment by Fine-tuning Embeddings on Parallel Corporacited by 186
  7. 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
  8. 2020SimAlign: High Quality Word Alignments without Parallel Training Data using Static and Contextualized Embeddingscited by 155
  9. 2023Hallucinations in Large Multilingual Translation Modelscited by 126
  10. 2023SONAR: Sentence-Level Multimodal and Language-Agnostic Representationscited by 105
  11. 2022Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Bettercited by 75
  12. 2021Understanding the Properties of Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding in Neural Machine Translationcited by 56
9 more
  1. 2021Improving Pretrained Cross-Lingual Language Models via Self-Labeled Word Alignmentcited by 41
  2. 2021Multi-Vector Models with Textual Guidance for Fine-Grained Scientific Document Similaritycited by 35
  3. 2023HalOmi: A Manually Annotated Benchmark for Multilingual Hallucination and Omission Detection in Machine Translationcited by 35
  4. 2017What does Attention in Neural Machine Translation Pay Attention to?cited by 30
  5. 2020End-to-End Neural Word Alignment Outperforms GIZA++cited by 28
  6. 2020A Supervised Word Alignment Method based on Cross-Language Span Prediction using Multilingual BERTcited by 27
  7. 2021Using Optimal Transport as Alignment Objective for fine-tuning Multilingual Contextualized Embeddingscited by 19
  8. 2021Neural semi-Markov CRF for Monolingual Word Alignmentcited by 15
  9. 2022Toward Interpretable Semantic Textual Similarity via Optimal Transport-based Contrastive Sentence Learningcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.