mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairness in Autonomous Driving: Towards Understanding Confounding Factors in Object Detection under Challenging Weather

arXiv 2406.00219 ↗First posted 31 May 2024cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is rapidly expanding to numerous cities. At the heart of AVs, the object detection module assumes a paramount role, directly influencing all downstream decision-making tasks by considering the presence of nearby pedestrians, vehicles, and more. Despite high accuracy of pedestrians detected on held-out datasets, the potential presence of algorithmic bias in such object detectors, particularly in challenging weather conditions, remains unclear. This study provides a comprehensive empirical analysis of fairness in detecting pedestrians in a state-of-the-art transformer-based object detector. In addition to classical metrics, we introduce novel probability-based metrics to measure various intricate properties of object detection. Leveraging the state-of-the-art FACET dataset and the Carla high-fidelity vehicle simulator, our analysis explores the effect of protected attributes such as gender, skin tone, and body size on object detection performance in varying environmental conditions such as ambient darkness and fog. Our quantitative analysis reveals how the previously overlooked yet intuitive factors, such as the distribution of demographic groups in the scene, the severity of weather, the pedestrians' proximity to the AV, among others, affect object detection performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/bimsarapathiraja/fair-AV.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2024.

Builds on

18 of 35 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  4. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  5. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  6. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  7. 2015On Wasserstein Two Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Testscited by 165
  8. 2021Disparities in Dermatology AI: Assessments Using Diverse Clinical Imagescited by 132
  9. 2019Predictive Inequity in Object Detectioncited by 77
  10. 2018M2Det: A Single-Shot Object Detector based on Multi-Level Feature Pyramid Networkcited by 76
  11. 2020DAWN: Vehicle Detection in Adverse Weather Nature Datasetcited by 41
  12. 2022Gender Artifacts in Visual Datasetscited by 38
6 more
  1. 2019Age and gender bias in pedestrian detection algorithmscited by 18
  2. 2022How Do We Fail? Stress Testing Perception in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 17
  3. 2023Humans, AI, and Context: Understanding End-Users' Trust in a Real-World Computer Vision Applicationcited by 14
  4. 2024The Role of Predictive Uncertainty and Diversity in Embodied AI and Robot Learningcited by 11
  5. 2022CF-YOLO: Cross Fusion YOLO for Object Detection in Adverse Weather with a High-quality Real Snow Datasetcited by 7
  6. 2022Uncertainty-Aware Online Merge Planning with Learned Driver Behaviorcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.