A Sim2Real Approach for Identifying Task-Relevant Properties in Interpretable Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explanations of an AI's function can assist human decision-makers, but the most useful explanation depends on the decision's context, referred to as the downstream task. User studies are necessary to determine the best explanations for each task. Unfortunately, testing every explanation and task combination is impractical, especially considering the many factors influencing human+AI collaboration beyond the explanation's content. This work leverages two insights to streamline finding the most effective explanation. First, explanations can be characterized by properties, such as faithfulness or complexity, which indicate if they contain the right information for the task. Second, we introduce XAIsim2real, a pipeline for running synthetic user studies. In our validation study, XAIsim2real accurately predicts user preferences across three tasks, making it a valuable tool for refining explanation choices before full studies. Additionally, it uncovers nuanced relationships, like how cognitive budget limits a user's engagement with complex explanations -- a trend confirmed with real users.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2024.
Builds on
44 of 72 references.
References · 44
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
- 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 328
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
- 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 302
- 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
- 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
- 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 190
32 more
- 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 188
- 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 159
- 2022Towards Human-centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanationscited by 85
- 2022ObjectFolder 2.0: A Multisensory Object Dataset for Sim2Real Transfercited by 75
- 2023Understanding the Role of Human Intuition on Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Making with Explanationscited by 73
- 2020A Sim2Real Deep Learning Approach for the Transformation of Images from Multiple Vehicle-Mounted Cameras to a Semantically Segmented Image in Bird's Eye Viewcited by 72
- 2019An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
- 2020On quantitative aspects of model interpretabilitycited by 71
- 2021Synthetic Benchmarks for Scientific Research in Explainable Machine Learningcited by 59
- 2021How can I choose an explainer? An Application-grounded Evaluation of Post-hoc Explanationscited by 58
- 2022Framework for Evaluating Faithfulness of Local Explanationscited by 55
- 2018Do Explanations make VQA Models more Predictable to a Human?cited by 52
- 2020Evaluations and Methods for Explanation through Robustness Analysiscited by 51
- 2022The Road to Explainability is Paved with Bias: Measuring the Fairness of Explanationscited by 41
- 2022Fairness via Explanation Quality: Evaluating Disparities in the Quality of Post hoc Explanationscited by 40
- 2022Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AIcited by 40
- 2018Human-in-the-Loop Interpretability Priorcited by 36
- 2023Selective Explanations: Leveraging Human Input to Align Explainable AIcited by 29
- 2019Human-grounded Evaluations of Explanation Methods for Text Classificationcited by 28
- 2022What Makes a Good Explanation?: A Harmonized View of Properties of Explanationscited by 22
- 2023The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-Makingcited by 21
- 2022SoK: Explainable Machine Learning for Computer Security Applicationscited by 20
- 2022Use-Case-Grounded Simulations for Explanation Evaluationcited by 19
- 2019Learning Representations by Humans, for Humanscited by 18
- 2023Accuracy-Time Tradeoffs in AI-Assisted Decision Making under Time Pressurecited by 17
- 2023Assessing Fidelity in XAI post-hoc techniques: A Comparative Study with Ground Truth Explanations Datasetscited by 15
- 2020Learning a Formula of Interpretability to Learn Interpretable Formulascited by 14
- 2021Crowdsourcing Evaluation of Saliency-based XAI Methodscited by 7
- 2021On the Importance of Domain-specific Explanations in AI-based Cybersecurity Systems (Technical Report)cited by 7
- 2023The Disagreement Problem in Faithfulness Metricscited by 6
- 2023Surrogate Empowered Sim2Real Transfer of Deep Reinforcement Learning for ORC Superheat Controlcited by 5
- 2024What is the focus of XAI in UI design? Prioritizing UI design principles for enhancing XAI user experiencecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.