Confidence-Aware Sub-Structure Beam Search (CABS): Mitigating Hallucination in Structured Data Generation with Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have facilitated structured data generation, with applications in domains like tabular data, document databases, product catalogs, etc. However, concerns persist about generation veracity due to incorrect references or hallucinations, necessitating the incorporation of some form of model confidence for mitigation. Existing confidence estimation methods on LLM generations primarily focus on the confidence at the individual token level or the entire output sequence level, limiting their applicability to structured data generation, which consists of an intricate mix of both independent and correlated entries at the sub-structure level. In this paper, we first investigate confidence estimation methods for generated sub-structure-level data. We introduce the concept of Confidence Network that applies on the hidden state of the LLM transformer, as a more targeted estimate than the traditional token conditional probability. We further propose Confidence-Aware sub-structure Beam Search (CABS), a novel decoding method operating at the sub-structure level in structured data generation. CABS enhances the faithfulness of structured data generation by considering confidence scores from the Confidence Network for each sub-structure-level data and iteratively refining the prompts. Results show that CABS outperforms traditional token-level beam search for structured data generation by 16.7% Recall at 90% precision averagely on the problem of product attribute generation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.
Builds on
18 of 26 references.
References · 18
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 906
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 751
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
- 2020How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 445
- 2021Unified Pre-training for Program Understanding and Generationcited by 366
- 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 294
- 2021On Hallucination and Predictive Uncertainty in Conditional Language Generationcited by 176
- 2020Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generationcited by 152
- 2019Sticking to the Facts: Confident Decoding for Faithful Data-to-Text Generationcited by 62
6 more
- 2021Text-to-Table: A New Way of Information Extractioncited by 47
- 2020A Cross-Task Analysis of Text Span Representationscited by 21
- 2023A Sequence-to-Sequence&Set Model for Text-to-Table Generationcited by 16
- 2023Simple Token-Level Confidence Improves Caption Correctnesscited by 11
- 2022SentBS: Sentence-level Beam Search for Controllable Summarizationcited by 10
- 2022Exploring Generative Models for Joint Attribute Value Extraction from Product Titlescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.