mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Scaling Laws for the Value of Individual Data Points in Machine Learning

arXiv 2405.20456 ↗First posted 30 May 2024cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent works have shown that machine learning models improve at a predictable rate with the total amount of training data, leading to scaling laws that describe the relationship between error and dataset size. These scaling laws can help design a model's training dataset, but they typically take an aggregate view of the data by only considering the dataset's size. We introduce a new perspective by investigating scaling behavior for the value of individual data points: we find that a data point's contribution to model's performance shrinks predictably with the size of the dataset in a log-linear manner. Interestingly, there is significant variability in the scaling exponent among different data points, indicating that certain points are more valuable in small datasets while others are relatively more useful as a part of large datasets. We provide learning theory to support our scaling law, and we observe empirically that it holds across diverse model classes. We further propose a maximum likelihood estimator and an amortized estimator to efficiently learn the individualized scaling behaviors from a small number of noisy observations per data point. Using our estimators, we provide insights into factors that influence the scaling behavior of different data points. Finally, we demonstrate applications of the individualized scaling laws to data valuation and data subset selection. Overall, our work represents a first step towards understanding and utilizing scaling properties for the value of individual data points.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

Builds on

29 of 39 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  5. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  6. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  7. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  8. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  9. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  10. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
  11. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
  12. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
17 more
  1. 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
  2. 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
  3. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
  4. 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 210
  5. 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 189
  6. 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 165
  7. 2023DataInf: Efficiently Estimating Data Influence in LoRA-tuned LLMs and Diffusion Modelscited by 123
  8. 2021Learning Curve Theorycited by 85
  9. 2022Tutorial on amortized optimizationcited by 83
  10. 2020A Distributional Framework for Data Valuationcited by 80
  11. 2023LAVA: Data Valuation without Pre-Specified Learning Algorithmscited by 69
  12. 2023OpenDataVal: a Unified Benchmark for Data Valuationcited by 55
  13. 2023Data-OOB: Out-of-bag Estimate as a Simple and Efficient Data Valuecited by 38
  14. 2021Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations in Training Datacited by 31
  15. 2022Variance reduced Shapley value estimation for trustworthy data valuationcited by 16
  16. 2023Evaluating Self-Supervised Learning via Risk Decompositioncited by 6
  17. 2018Deterministic Inequalities for Smooth M-estimatorscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

10 papers.