Scaling Laws for the Value of Individual Data Points in Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent works have shown that machine learning models improve at a predictable rate with the total amount of training data, leading to scaling laws that describe the relationship between error and dataset size. These scaling laws can help design a model's training dataset, but they typically take an aggregate view of the data by only considering the dataset's size. We introduce a new perspective by investigating scaling behavior for the value of individual data points: we find that a data point's contribution to model's performance shrinks predictably with the size of the dataset in a log-linear manner. Interestingly, there is significant variability in the scaling exponent among different data points, indicating that certain points are more valuable in small datasets while others are relatively more useful as a part of large datasets. We provide learning theory to support our scaling law, and we observe empirically that it holds across diverse model classes. We further propose a maximum likelihood estimator and an amortized estimator to efficiently learn the individualized scaling behaviors from a small number of noisy observations per data point. Using our estimators, we provide insights into factors that influence the scaling behavior of different data points. Finally, we demonstrate applications of the individualized scaling laws to data valuation and data subset selection. Overall, our work represents a first step towards understanding and utilizing scaling properties for the value of individual data points.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.
Builds on
29 of 39 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
- 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
17 more
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
- 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 210
- 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 189
- 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 165
- 2023DataInf: Efficiently Estimating Data Influence in LoRA-tuned LLMs and Diffusion Modelscited by 123
- 2021Learning Curve Theorycited by 85
- 2022Tutorial on amortized optimizationcited by 83
- 2020A Distributional Framework for Data Valuationcited by 80
- 2023LAVA: Data Valuation without Pre-Specified Learning Algorithmscited by 69
- 2023OpenDataVal: a Unified Benchmark for Data Valuationcited by 55
- 2023Data-OOB: Out-of-bag Estimate as a Simple and Efficient Data Valuecited by 38
- 2021Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations in Training Datacited by 31
- 2022Variance reduced Shapley value estimation for trustworthy data valuationcited by 16
- 2023Evaluating Self-Supervised Learning via Risk Decompositioncited by 6
- 2018Deterministic Inequalities for Smooth M-estimatorscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Modelscited by 29
- 2025(Mis)Fitting: A Survey of Scaling Lawscited by 26
- 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencodercited by 12
- 2025How to Upscale Neural Networks with Scaling Law? A Survey and Practical Guidelinescited by 5
- 2024Safety vs. Performance: How Multi-Objective Learning Reduces Barriers to Market Entrycited by 4
- 2026AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releasescited by 3
- 2024Unsupervised Data Validation Methods for Efficient Model Trainingcited by 1
- 2025DROP: Poison Dilution via Knowledge Distillation for Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2026Physics-Informed Uncertainty Enables Reliable AI-driven Designcited by 0
- 2026On the Fragility of Data Attribution When Learning Is Distributedcited by 0
- 2026On the Fragility of Data Attribution When Learning Is Distributed15 May 2026
- 2026AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases27 Feb 2026
- 2026Physics-Informed Uncertainty Enables Reliable AI-driven Design26 Jan 2026
- 2025(Mis)Fitting: A Survey of Scaling Laws26 Feb 2025
- 2025Diversity-driven Data Selection for Language Model Tuning through Sparse Autoencoder19 Feb 2025
- 2025How to Upscale Neural Networks with Scaling Law? A Survey and Practical Guidelines17 Feb 2025
- 2025DROP: Poison Dilution via Knowledge Distillation for Federated Learning10 Feb 2025
- 2024Unsupervised Data Validation Methods for Efficient Model Training10 Oct 2024
- 2024Safety vs. Performance: How Multi-Objective Learning Reduces Barriers to Market Entry5 Sep 2024
- 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Models4 Aug 2024