mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is Self-Supervised Learning Enough to Fill in the Gap? A Study on Speech Inpainting

arXiv 2405.20101 ↗First posted 30 May 2024cs.SD cs.CL eess.AScited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Speech inpainting consists in reconstructing corrupted or missing speech segments using surrounding context, a process that closely resembles the pretext tasks in Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) for speech encoders. This study investigates using SSL-trained speech encoders for inpainting without any additional training beyond the initial pretext task, and simply adding a decoder to generate a waveform. We compare this approach to supervised fine-tuning of speech encoders for a downstream task -- here, inpainting. Practically, we integrate HuBERT as the SSL encoder and HiFi-GAN as the decoder in two configurations: (1) fine-tuning the decoder to align with the frozen pre-trained encoder's output and (2) fine-tuning the encoder for an inpainting task based on a frozen decoder's input. Evaluations are conducted under single- and multi-speaker conditions using in-domain datasets and out-of-domain datasets (including unseen speakers, diverse speaking styles, and noise). Both informed and blind inpainting scenarios are considered, where the position of the corrupted segment is either known or unknown. The proposed SSL-based methods are benchmarked against several baselines, including a text-informed method combining automatic speech recognition with zero-shot text-to-speech synthesis. Performance is assessed using objective metrics and perceptual evaluations. The results demonstrate that both approaches outperform baselines, successfully reconstructing speech segments up to 200 ms, and sometimes up to 400 ms. Notably, fine-tuning the SSL encoder achieves more accurate speech reconstruction in single-speaker settings, while a pre-trained encoder proves more effective for multi-speaker scenarios. This demonstrates that an SSL pretext task can transfer to speech inpainting, enabling successful speech reconstruction with a pre-trained encoder.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

Builds on

38 of 85 references.

References · 38

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
  4. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
  5. 2021HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Unitscited by 2,301
  6. 2021WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processingcited by 1,609
  7. 2020HiFi-GAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Efficient and High Fidelity Speech Synthesiscited by 1,139
  8. 2023Neural Codec Language Models are Zero-Shot Text to Speech Synthesizerscited by 737
  9. 2022AudioLM: a Language Modeling Approach to Audio Generationcited by 611
  10. 2019Libri-Light: A Benchmark for ASR with Limited or No Supervisioncited by 462
  11. 2021Generative Spoken Language Modeling from Raw Audiocited by 336
  12. 2021YourTTS: Towards Zero-Shot Multi-Speaker TTS and Zero-Shot Voice Conversion for everyonecited by 277
26 more
  1. 2022Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Reviewcited by 258
  2. 2021Speech Resynthesis from Discrete Disentangled Self-Supervised Representationscited by 243
  3. 2017Supervised Speech Separation Based on Deep Learning: An Overviewcited by 213
  4. 2022Comparative layer-wise analysis of self-supervised speech modelscited by 155
  5. 2023EXPRESSO: A Benchmark and Analysis of Discrete Expressive Speech Resynthesiscited by 93
  6. 2021VoiceFixer: Toward General Speech Restoration with Neural Vocodercited by 50
  7. 2015End-to-End Text-Dependent Speaker Verificationcited by 49
  8. 2023UniCATS: A Unified Context-Aware Text-to-Speech Framework with Contextual VQ-Diffusion and Vocodingcited by 37
  9. 2016Inpainting of long audio segments with similarity graphscited by 10
  10. 2020Audio-Visual Speech Inpainting with Deep Learningcited by 10
  11. 2022Self-Supervised Learning for Speech Enhancement through Synthesiscited by 10
  12. 2019Tracking Naturalistic Linguistic Predictions with Deep Neural Language Modelscited by 9
  13. 2019Parametric Resynthesis with neural vocoderscited by 8
  14. 2019Deep speech inpainting of time-frequency maskscited by 8
  15. 2020A survey and an extensive evaluation of popular audio declipping methodscited by 7
  16. 2022INTERSPEECH 2022 Audio Deep Packet Loss Concealment Challengecited by 6
  17. 2021Adversarial Auto-Encoding for Packet Loss Concealmentcited by 5
  18. 2020ConcealNet: An End-to-end Neural Network for Packet Loss Concealment in Deep Speech Emotion Recognitioncited by 4
  19. 2022SelfRemaster: Self-Supervised Speech Restoration with Analysis-by-Synthesis Approach Using Channel Modelingcited by 4
  20. 2022Real-Time Packet Loss Concealment With Mixed Generative and Predictive Modelcited by 4
  21. 2024BS-PLCNet: Band-split Packet Loss Concealment Network with Multi-task Learning Framework and Multi-discriminatorscited by 4
  22. 2022tPLCnet: Real-time Deep Packet Loss Concealment in the Time Domain Using a Short Temporal Contextcited by 3
  23. 2022Improving performance of real-time full-band blind packet-loss concealment with predictive networkcited by 2
  24. 2021Speech Prediction using an Adaptive Recurrent Neural Network with Application to Packet Loss Concealmentcited by 1
  25. 2022A Neural Vocoder Based Packet Loss Concealment Algorithmcited by 1
  26. 2023Contrast-PLC: Contrastive Learning for Packet Loss Concealmentcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.