mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Symbolic Tasks to Code Generation: Diversification Yields Better Task Performers

arXiv 2405.19787 ↗First posted 30 May 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning -- tuning large language models on instruction-output pairs -- is a promising technique for making models better adapted to the real world. Yet, the key factors driving the model's capability to understand and follow instructions not seen during training remain under-explored. Our investigation begins with a series of synthetic experiments within the theoretical framework of a Turing-complete algorithm called Markov algorithm, which allows fine-grained control over the instruction-tuning data. Generalization and robustness with respect to the training distribution emerge once a diverse enough set of tasks is provided, even though very few examples are provided for each task. We extend these initial results to a real-world application scenario of code generation and find that a more diverse instruction set, extending beyond code-related tasks, improves the performance of code generation. Our observations suggest that a more diverse semantic space for instruction-tuning sets greatly improves the model's ability to follow instructions and perform tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

Builds on

23 of 32 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  5. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  6. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  7. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  8. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  9. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  10. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  11. 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,154
  12. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
11 more
  1. 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 475
  2. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
  3. 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 395
  4. 2022OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalizationcited by 235
  5. 2023How Abilities in Large Language Models are Affected by Supervised Fine-tuning Data Compositioncited by 222
  6. 2021CrossFit: A Few-shot Learning Challenge for Cross-task Generalization in NLPcited by 142
  7. 2023Domain Specialization as the Key to Make Large Language Models Disruptive: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 134
  8. 2023Instruction Mining: Instruction Data Selection for Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 57
  9. 2024Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuningcited by 57
  10. 2024SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-Reflectioncited by 34
  11. 2023Rethinking the Instruction Quality: LIFT is What You Needcited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.