mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Accurate and Reliable Predictions with Mutual-Transport Ensemble

arXiv 2405.19656 ↗First posted 30 May 2024cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable success in a variety of tasks, especially when it comes to prediction accuracy. However, in complex real-world scenarios, particularly in safety-critical applications, high accuracy alone is not enough. Reliable uncertainty estimates are crucial. Modern DNNs, often trained with cross-entropy loss, tend to be overconfident, especially with ambiguous samples. To improve uncertainty calibration, many techniques have been developed, but they often compromise prediction accuracy. To tackle this challenge, we propose the ``mutual-transport ensemble'' (MTE). This approach introduces a co-trained auxiliary model and adaptively regularizes the cross-entropy loss using Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the prediction distributions of the primary and auxiliary models. We conducted extensive studies on various benchmarks to validate the effectiveness of our method. The results show that MTE can simultaneously enhance both accuracy and uncertainty calibration. For example, on the CIFAR-100 dataset, our MTE method on ResNet34/50 achieved significant improvements compared to previous state-of-the-art method, with absolute accuracy increases of 2.4%/3.7%, relative reductions in ECE of 42.3%/29.4%, and relative reductions in classwise-ECE of 11.6%/15.3%.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

Builds on

21 of 32 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  6. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  7. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  8. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  9. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
  10. 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
  11. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
  12. 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 438
9 more
  1. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
  2. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 353
  3. 2020Post-hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarioscited by 61
  4. 2019Uncertainty Quantification with Statistical Guarantees in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 60
  5. 2022A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: A Train-Time Regularizing Loss for Improved Neural Network Calibrationcited by 49
  6. 2020Improved Trainable Calibration Method for Neural Networks on Medical Imaging Classificationcited by 37
  7. 2022Uncertainty-Informed Deep Learning Models Enable High-Confidence Predictions for Digital Histopathologycited by 37
  8. 2022Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Explicit Regularisation and Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 18
  9. 2023Learning Sample Difficulty from Pre-trained Models for Reliable Predictioncited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.