mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Clustering-Based Validation Splits for Model Selection under Domain Shift

arXiv 2405.19461 ↗First posted 29 May 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper considers the problem of model selection under domain shift. Motivated by principles from distributionally robust optimisation and domain adaptation theory, it is proposed that the training-validation split should maximise the distribution mismatch between the two sets. By adopting the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) as the measure of mismatch, it is shown that the partitioning problem reduces to kernel k-means clustering. A constrained clustering algorithm, which leverages linear programming to control the size, label, and (optionally) group distributions of the splits, is presented. The algorithm does not require additional metadata, and comes with convergence guarantees. In experiments, the technique consistently outperforms alternative splitting strategies across a range of datasets and training algorithms, for both domain generalisation and unsupervised domain adaptation tasks. Analysis also shows the MMD between the training and validation sets to be well-correlated with test domain accuracy, further substantiating the validity of this approach.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.

Builds on

25 of 46 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  2. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  4. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  5. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  6. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  7. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  8. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,194
  9. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
  10. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
  11. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
  12. 2019Domain Generalization Using a Mixture of Multiple Latent Domainscited by 170
13 more
  1. 2021On Calibration and Out-of-domain Generalizationcited by 134
  2. 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 129
  3. 2020A survey on domain adaptation theory: learning bounds and theoretical guaranteescited by 109
  4. 2021Towards a Theoretical Framework of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 94
  5. 2022A Whac-A-Mole Dilemma: Shortcuts Come in Multiples Where Mitigating One Amplifies Otherscited by 85
  6. 2020We Need to Talk About Random Splitscited by 70
  7. 2020SVIRO: Synthetic Vehicle Interior Rear Seat Occupancy Dataset and Benchmarkcited by 21
  8. 2021A comparison of approaches to improve worst-case predictive model performance over patient subpopulationscited by 12
  9. 2017Kernel k-Groups via Hartigan's Methodcited by 9
  10. 2022Towards Optimization and Model Selection for Domain Generalization: A Mixup-guided Solutioncited by 6
  11. 2024Kernel KMeans clustering splits for end-to-end unsupervised decision treescited by 4
  12. 2014Scalable Kernel Clustering: Approximate Kernel k-meanscited by 2
  13. 2023A principled approach to model validation in domain generalizationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.