STIQ: Safeguarding Training and Inferencing of Quantum Neural Networks from Untrusted Cloud
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The high expenses imposed by current quantum cloud providers, coupled with the escalating need for quantum resources, may incentivize the emergence of cheaper cloud-based quantum services from potentially untrusted providers. Deploying or hosting quantum models, such as Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs), on these untrusted platforms introduces a myriad of security concerns, with the most critical one being model theft. This vulnerability stems from the cloud provider's full access to these circuits during training and/or inference. In this work, we introduce STIQ, a novel ensemble-based strategy designed to safeguard QNNs against such cloud-based adversaries. Our method innovatively trains two distinct QNNs concurrently, hosting them on same or different platforms, in a manner that each network yields obfuscated outputs rendering the individual QNNs ineffective for adversaries operating within cloud environments. However, when these outputs are combined locally (using an aggregate function), they reveal the correct result. Through extensive experiments across various QNNs and datasets, our technique has proven to effectively masks the accuracy and losses of the individually hosted models by upto 76%, albeit at the expense of ≤ 2× increase in the total computational overhead. This trade-off, however, is a small price to pay for the enhanced security and integrity of QNNs in a cloud-based environment prone to untrusted adversaries. We also demonstrated STIQ's practical application by evaluating it on multiple real quantum hardwares, showing that STIQ achieves up to ≈ 70% obfuscation, with combined performance similar to an unobfuscated model.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.
Builds on
15 of 39 references.
References · 15
- 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 379
- 2018Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inferencecited by 193
- 2018Quantum generative adversarial networkscited by 128
- 2021QuantumNAS: Noise-Adaptive Search for Robust Quantum Circuitscited by 98
- 2022QOC: Quantum On-Chip Training with Parameter Shift and Gradient Pruningcited by 23
- 2021Quantum-Classical Hybrid Machine Learning for Image Classification (ICCAD Special Session Paper)cited by 14
- 2023An Empirical Comparison of Optimizers for Quantum Machine Learning with SPSA-based Gradientscited by 14
- 2023QUILT: Effective Multi-Class Classification on Quantum Computers Using an Ensemble of Diverse Quantum Classifierscited by 11
- 2017Quantum ensembles of quantum classifierscited by 10
- 2024QuantumLeak: Stealing Quantum Neural Networks from Cloud-based NISQ Machinescited by 7
- 2024Evaluating Efficacy of Model Stealing Attacks and Defenses on Quantum Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2022Security Aspects of Quantum Machine Learning: Opportunities, Threats and Defensescited by 5
3 more
- 2016Quantum homomorphic encryption for polynomial-sized circuitscited by 4
- 2023Toward Privacy in Quantum Program Execution On Untrusted Quantum Cloud Computing Machines for Business-sensitive Quantum Needscited by 4
- 2014Limitations on information theoretically secure quantum homomorphic encryptioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.