mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Modeling Long Sequences in Bladder Cancer Recurrence: A Comparative Evaluation of LSTM,Transformer,and Mamba

arXiv 2405.18518 ↗First posted 28 May 2024cs.LG stat.ME stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional survival analysis methods often struggle with complex time-dependent data,failing to capture and interpret dynamic characteristics adequately.This study aims to evaluate the performance of three long-sequence models,LSTM,Transformer,and Mamba,in analyzing recurrence event data and integrating them with the Cox proportional hazards model.This study integrates the advantages of deep learning models for handling long-sequence data with the Cox proportional hazards model to enhance the performance in analyzing recurrent events with dynamic time information.Additionally,this study compares the ability of different models to extract and utilize features from time-dependent clinical recurrence data.The LSTM-Cox model outperformed both the Transformer-Cox and Mamba-Cox models in prediction accuracy and model fit,achieving a Concordance index of up to 0.90 on the test set.Significant predictors of bladder cancer recurrence,such as treatment stop time,maximum tumor size at recurrence and recurrence frequency,were identified.The LSTM-Cox model aligned well with clinical outcomes,effectively distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk patient groups.This study demonstrates that the LSTM-Cox model is a robust and efficient method for recurrent data analysis and feature extraction,surpassing newer models like Transformer and Mamba.It offers a practical approach for integrating deep learning technologies into clinical risk prediction systems,thereby improving patient management and treatment outcomes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2024.

Builds on

3 of 33 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Enhancing Personalized Bladder Cancer Treatment Through Reinforcement Learning: A Recurrent Patient State Transition Decision Support Framework
  2. 2025VMRA-MaR: An Asymmetry-Aware Temporal Framework for Longitudinal Breast Cancer Risk Prediction
  3. 2023A New Deep State-Space Analysis Framework for Patient Latent State Estimation and Classification from EHR Time Series Data
  4. 2021Bladder segmentation based on deep learning approaches: current limitations and lessons
  5. 2026CACSurv: Concordance-Aligned Comparative Learning with Large Language Models for Cancer Survival Prediction
  6. 2025Advanced Deep Learning and Large Language Models: Comprehensive Insights for Cancer Detection
  7. 2025CoC: Chain-of-Cancer based on Cross-Modal Autoregressive Traction for Survival Prediction
  8. 2025Timepoint-Specific Benchmarking of Deep Learning Models for Glioblastoma Follow-Up MRI