mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Learning Calabi-Yau four folds with hybrid and recurrent neural network architectures

arXiv 2405.17406 ↗First posted 27 May 2024hep-th cs.LG math.AGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we report the results of applying deep learning based on hybrid convolutional-recurrent and purely recurrent neural network architectures to the dataset of almost one million complete intersection Calabi-Yau four-folds (CICY4) to machine-learn their four Hodge numbers h1,1, h2,1, h3,1, h2,2. In particular, we explored and experimented with twelve different neural network models, nine of which are convolutional-recurrent (CNN-RNN) hybrids with the RNN unit being either GRU (Gated Recurrent Unit) or Long Short Term Memory (LSTM). The remaining four models are purely recurrent neural networks based on LSTM. In terms of the h1,1, h2,1, h3,1, h2,2 prediction accuracies, at 72% training ratio, our best performing individual model is CNN-LSTM-400, a hybrid CNN-LSTM with the LSTM hidden size of 400, which obtained 99.74%, 98.07%, 95.19%, 81.01%, our second best performing individual model is LSTM-448, an LSTM-based model with the hidden size of 448, which obtained 99.74%, 97.51%, 94.24%, and 78.63%. These results were improved by forming ensembles of the top two, three or even four models. Our best ensemble, consisting of the top four models, achieved the accuracies of 99.84%, 98.71%, 96.26%, 85.03%. At 80% training ratio, the top two performing models LSTM-448 and LSTM-424 are both LSTM-based with the hidden sizes of 448 and 424. Compared with the 72% training ratio, there is a significant improvement of accuracies, which reached 99.85%, 98.66%, 96.26%, 84.77% for the best individual model and 99.90%, 99.03%, 97.97%, 87.34% for the best ensemble. By nature a proof of concept, the results of this work conclusively established the utility of RNN-based architectures and demonstrated their effective performances compared to the well-explored purely CNN-based architectures in the problem of deep learning Calabi Yau manifolds.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.

Builds on

20 of 57 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  6. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  7. 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,436
  8. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,304
  9. 2020ReZero is All You Need: Fast Convergence at Large Depthcited by 264
  10. 2015Gated Feedback Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 54
  11. 2022Sequencer: Deep LSTM for Image Classificationcited by 23
  12. 2018Machine Learning CICY Threefoldscited by 22
8 more
  1. 2018The Calabi-Yau Landscape: from Geometry, to Physics, to Machine-Learningcited by 19
  2. 2020Machine learning for complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds: a methodological studycited by 17
  3. 2020Machine Learning Calabi-Yau Four-foldscited by 17
  4. 2021Machine Learning Calabi-Yau Hypersurfacescited by 15
  5. 2020Inception Neural Network for Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau 3-foldscited by 14
  6. 2020Explore and Exploit with Heterotic Line Bundle Modelscited by 11
  7. 2021Deep multi-task mining Calabi-Yau four-foldscited by 11
  8. 2023Deep learning complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifoldscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.