mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Do the Architecture and Optimizer Affect Representation Learning? On the Training Dynamics of Representations in Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2405.17377 ↗First posted 27 May 2024cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we elucidate how representations in deep neural networks (DNNs) evolve during training. Our focus is on overparameterized learning settings where the training continues much after the trained DNN starts to perfectly fit its training data. We examine the evolution of learned representations along the entire training process. We explore the representational similarity of DNN layers, each layer with respect to its own representations throughout the training process. For this, we use two similarity metrics: (1) The centered kernel alignment (CKA) similarity; (2) Similarity of decision regions of linear classifier probes that we train for the DNN layers. We visualize and analyze the decision regions of the DNN output and the layer probes during the DNN training to show how they geometrically evolve. Our extensive experiments discover training dynamics patterns that can emerge in layers depending on the relative layer-depth, architecture and optimizer. Among our findings: (i) The training phases, including those related to memorization, are more distinguishable in SGD training than in Adam training, and for Vision Transformer (ViT) than for ResNet; (ii) Unlike ResNet, the ViT layers have synchronized dynamics of representation learning.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.

Builds on

18 of 26 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  4. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  5. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
  6. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
  7. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  8. 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 324
  9. 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 245
  10. 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 126
  11. 2023Noise Is Not the Main Factor Behind the Gap Between SGD and Adam on Transformers, but Sign Descent Might Becited by 114
  12. 2018A Closer Look at Deep Learning Heuristics: Learning rate restarts, Warmup and Distillationcited by 110
6 more
  1. 2020When Do Curricula Work?cited by 106
  2. 2023Can Neural Network Memorization Be Localized?cited by 69
  3. 2022Can Neural Nets Learn the Same Model Twice? Investigating Reproducibility and Double Descent from the Decision Boundary Perspectivecited by 57
  4. 2021AutoFreeze: Automatically Freezing Model Blocks to Accelerate Fine-tuningcited by 48
  5. 2023On the Implicit Bias of Adamcited by 27
  6. 2022What do CNNs Learn in the First Layer and Why? A Linear Systems Perspectivecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.